Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020
78 Imaging
65 Features
23 Overall
48
95 Imaging
35 Features
20 Overall
29
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 160 - 10000
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released May 2012
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 64 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-120mm (F3.3-5.8) lens
- 137g - 93 x 56 x 25mm
- Released July 2009
- Other Name is X-935
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Leica M-Monochrom and Olympus FE-5020, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a substantial gap between the resolutions of the M-Monochrom (18MP) and FE-5020 (12MP) and the M-Monochrom (Full frame) and FE-5020 (1/2.3") feature different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M-Monochrom was released 2 years after the FE-5020 which is quite a big difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Leica M-Monochrom being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus FE-5020 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a short synopsis of how the M-Monochrom grades against the FE-5020 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M-Monochrom & Olympus FE-5020. The complete galleries are provided at Leica M-Monochrom Gallery & Olympus FE-5020 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M-Monochrom over the Olympus FE-5020
M-Monochrom | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | May 2012 | July 2009 | More modern by 35 months | |
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-5020 over the Leica M-Monochrom
FE-5020 | M-Monochrom | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 2.7" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.2") |
Common features in the Leica M-Monochrom and Olympus FE-5020
M-Monochrom | FE-5020 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen resolution | 230k | 230k | The same screen resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither provides selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to carry around your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica M-Monochrom provides external dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Olympus FE-5020 has proportions of 93mm x 56mm x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") and a weight of 137 grams (0.30 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M-Monochrom and Olympus FE-5020 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view measurements comparison of the M-Monochrom versus the FE-5020.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the M-Monochrom and FE-5020 is 78 and 95 respectively.
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it's tough to picture the difference between sensor sizes just by reading through technical specs. The pic below should provide you a greater sense of the sensor dimensions in the M-Monochrom and FE-5020.
As you have seen, both of those cameras have got different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The M-Monochrom featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M-Monochrom will give you extra detail as a result of its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop shots much more aggressively. The newer M-Monochrom should have an advantage when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M-Monochrom vs Olympus FE-5020 Specifications
Leica M-Monochrom | Olympus FE-5020 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M-Monochrom | Olympus FE-5020 |
Also Known as | - | X-935 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Released | 2012-05-10 | 2009-07-22 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 12MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 3968 x 2976 |
Highest native ISO | 10000 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 160 | 64 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.8 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 2.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of display | 230 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD with a sapphire glass LCD cover | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 32s | 4s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/500s |
Continuous shooting speed | 2.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.10 m |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 137g (0.30 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 93 x 56 x 25mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 1.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | - | LI-42B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 seconds) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | xD-Picture Card, microSD |
Storage slots | One | One |
Cost at launch | $7,950 | $160 |