Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
67 Imaging
62 Features
88 Overall
72
Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 20.3MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 536g - 130 x 94 x 77mm
- Released April 2019
- Additionally referred to as Lumix DMC-G90
- Old Model is Panasonic G85
Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95 Overview
Below, we will be looking at the Leica M Typ 240 and Panasonic G95, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Panasonic. The sensor resolution of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and the G95 (20.3MP) is pretty well matched but the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and G95 (Four Thirds) come with totally different sensor sizes.
Nikon Coolpix camera search on Google skyrockets by 8,500%The M Typ 240 was revealed 7 years earlier than the G95 which is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic G95 being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a complete comparison, below is a short overview of how the M Typ 240 grades against the G95 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 240 and Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Panasonic G95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Panasonic G95
M Typ 240 | G95 |
---|
Reasons to pick Panasonic G95 over the Leica M Typ 240
G95 | M Typ 240 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | April 2019 | September 2012 | More modern by 79 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 1240k | 920k | Clearer screen (+320k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies | |||
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Panasonic G95
M Typ 240 | G95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focus | |||
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen dimensions |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is planning to carry around your camera, you'll need to factor its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 has got physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Panasonic G95 has specifications of 130mm x 94mm x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") and a weight of 536 grams (1.18 lbs).
Compare the Leica M Typ 240 and Panasonic G95 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have during that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 240 and the G95.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and G95 is 74 and 67 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is tough to visualise the difference between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The image here will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 240 and G95.
Plainly, each of the cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor sizes. The M Typ 240 having a bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will give more detail because of its extra 3.7MP. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop photographs much more aggressively. The more aged M Typ 240 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Panasonic G95 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Panasonic |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-G95 |
Otherwise known as | - | Lumix DMC-G90 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2019-04-05 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Venus Engine |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 20.3 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 5184 x 3888 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Number of focus points | - | 49 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen size | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dot | 1,240 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360 thousand dot |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Maximum silent shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 9.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.40 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, Auto/Red-eye Reduction, Forced On, Forced On/Red-eye Reduction, Slow Sync., Slow Sync./Red-eye Reduction, Forced Off |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 100 Mbps, MP4, H.264, AAC |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 536g (1.18 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 130 x 94 x 77mm (5.1" x 3.7" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 290 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 secs, 10 secs x 3 shots) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC card (UHS-II supported) |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at launch | $5,479 | $998 |