Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
61 Imaging
50 Features
41 Overall
46
Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced September 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Pentax KAF2 Mount
- 690g - 134 x 95 x 74mm
- Released September 2008
- Older Model is Pentax K100D S
Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D Overview
Lets look a little more closely at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Pentax K200D, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Leica and Pentax. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and K200D (10MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and K200D (APS-C) have totally different sensor sizing.
AI-Powered Photo Editing Tools Could Be Added to WhatsAppThe M Typ 240 was revealed 4 years later than the K200D and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Pentax K200D being a Compact SLR camera.
Before getting right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise summary of how the M Typ 240 scores vs the K200D when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 240 & Pentax K200D. The full galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery & Pentax K200D Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Pentax K200D
M Typ 240 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | September 2012 | September 2008 | Fresher by 50 months | |
Display size | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Reasons to pick Pentax K200D over the Leica M Typ 240
K200D | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Pentax K200D
M Typ 240 | K200D | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lack of Touch display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D Physical Comparison
If you're planning to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 240 provides physical measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Pentax K200D has measurements of 134mm x 95mm x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") along with a weight of 690 grams (1.52 lbs).
Examine the Leica M Typ 240 versus Pentax K200D in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are using at the time. Underneath is a front view proportions comparison of the M Typ 240 vs the K200D.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and K200D is 74 and 61 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to see the difference between sensor sizing merely by reading specifications. The graphic here will give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and K200D.
Plainly, both the cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 240 with its larger sensor will make shooting bokeh less difficult and the Leica M Typ 240 will offer you greater detail because of its extra 14MP. Greater resolution will also let you crop images way more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 is going to have an edge in sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Pentax K200D Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Pentax K200D | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Leica | Pentax |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Pentax K200D |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2012-09-17 | 2008-09-01 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.5 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 369.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3872 x 2592 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | Pentax KAF2 |
Number of lenses | 59 | 151 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 920k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1 percent | 96 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.57x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 30 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 13.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | - |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lb) | 690g (1.52 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 134 x 95 x 74mm (5.3" x 3.7" x 2.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | 64 |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | 22.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | 11.4 |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | 561 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photos | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | - | 4 x AA |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $5,479 | $600 |