Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Announced February 2012
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
On this page, we are contrasting the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Ricoh. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) offer different sensor measurements.
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuitThe M Typ 240 was manufactured 8 months later than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 so they are both of a similar generation. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go straight to a in depth comparison, here is a simple view of how the M Typ 240 grades vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 for portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are available at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
M Typ 240 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2012 | February 2012 | More recent by 8 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Leica M Typ 240
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
M Typ 240 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurements | |
Display resolution | 920k | 920k | The same display resolution | |
Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither offers Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Leica M Typ 240 offers outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has dimensions of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") and a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M Typ 240 versus Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 240 against the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M Typ 240 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 74 and 69 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to visualize the gap in sensor measurements merely by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here will provide you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 240 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 240 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 240 will result in greater detail due to its extra 8MP. Greater resolution can also enable you to crop photos more aggressively. The younger M Typ 240 provides a benefit with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Revealed | 2012-09-17 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Total lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash synchronize | 1/180 seconds | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 lbs) | 550g (1.21 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 shots | 400 shots |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $5,479 | $871 |