Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95
74 Imaging
70 Features
47 Overall
60
99 Imaging
39 Features
19 Overall
31
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica M Mount
- 680g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched September 2012
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Introduced January 2011
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95 Overview
Lets take a more detailed look at the Leica M Typ 240 and Samsung ST95, one is a Pro Mirrorless and the latter is a Ultracompact by brands Leica and Samsung. There exists a big gap among the resolutions of the M Typ 240 (24MP) and ST95 (16MP) and the M Typ 240 (Full frame) and ST95 (1/2.3") posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe M Typ 240 was unveiled 21 months after the ST95 which makes them a generation away from one another. Both of the cameras feature different body design with the Leica M Typ 240 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung ST95 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before going right into a thorough comparison, here is a simple summation of how the M Typ 240 matches up vs the ST95 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 240 and Samsung ST95. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 240 Gallery and Samsung ST95 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 240 over the Samsung ST95
M Typ 240 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | September 2012 | January 2011 | Newer by 21 months | |
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen resolution | 920k | 460k | Crisper screen (+460k dot) |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST95 over the Leica M Typ 240
ST95 | M Typ 240 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 240 and Samsung ST95
M Typ 240 | ST95 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen size | 3" | 3" | Same screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch screen | Lack of Touch screen |
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to think about its weight and size. The Leica M Typ 240 enjoys exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 680 grams (1.50 lbs) while the Samsung ST95 has specifications of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 240 and Samsung ST95 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen at that time. Following is a front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 240 and the ST95.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 240 and ST95 is 74 and 99 respectively.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, its difficult to envision the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by going through technical specs. The picture here should give you a stronger sense of the sensor measurements in the M Typ 240 and ST95.
As you have seen, both the cameras feature different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 240 with its bigger sensor will make achieving shallow depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 240 will provide more detail having an extra 8MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 240 will have a benefit with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 240 vs Samsung ST95 Specifications
Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung ST95 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Samsung |
Model | Leica M Typ 240 | Samsung ST95 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2012-09-17 | 2011-01-19 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Cross focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | () |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 920 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 1% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 60 secs | 8 secs |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | - |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (25,24 fps), 1280 x 720 (25, 24 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 680g (1.50 pounds) | - |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.0 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.3 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1860 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 images | - |
Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | - |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $5,479 | $145 |