Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
82 Imaging
54 Features
77 Overall
63
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Launched November 2015
- Also referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 390g - 120 x 83 x 47mm
- Revealed August 2015
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10
- Replacement is Olympus E-M10 III
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M10 II, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There exists a noticeable gap among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and E-M10 II (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and E-M10 II (Four Thirds) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe M Typ 262 was introduced 3 months later than the E-M10 II so they are both of a similar age. Both of the cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus E-M10 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief summation of how the M Typ 262 matches up versus the E-M10 II in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 & Olympus OM-D E-M10 II. The whole galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Olympus E-M10 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Olympus E-M10 II
M Typ 262 | E-M10 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 II over the Leica M Typ 262
E-M10 II | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting display | |
Display resolution | 1040k | 921k | Crisper display (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M10 II
M Typ 262 | E-M10 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2015 | August 2015 | Same age | |
Focus manually | Dial precise focus | |||
Display dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera regularly, you're going to have to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 has got exterior dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") accompanied by a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Olympus E-M10 II has proportions of 120mm x 83mm x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") and a weight of 390 grams (0.86 lbs).
Analyze the Leica M Typ 262 and Olympus E-M10 II in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Here is a front view sizing comparison of the M Typ 262 vs the E-M10 II.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and E-M10 II is 77 and 82 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is very hard to visualise the gap in sensor sizing simply by checking out specs. The visual below might give you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and E-M10 II.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 262 using its larger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will produce more detail using its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also help you crop pics a bit more aggressively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Olympus E-M10 II Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 II |
Also called | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2015-11-19 | 2015-08-25 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Maestro | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest Possible resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Minimum enhanced ISO | 100 | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 81 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 59 | 107 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 1,040k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dot |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 5.80 m (ISO 100) |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, fill flash, flash off, 1st-curtain slow sync w/redeye, 1st-curtain slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (60p/30p/24p), 1280 x 720 (60p/30p/24p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1920x1080 |
Video format | - | H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 lbs) | 390 grams (0.86 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 120 x 83 x 47mm (4.7" x 3.3" x 1.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 73 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.1 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.5 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 842 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (12 sec., 2 sec, custom) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $5,069 | $499 |