Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
94 Imaging
37 Features
30 Overall
34
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Revealed November 2015
- Also Known as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-224mm (F3.3-5.9) lens
- 170g - 100 x 57 x 27mm
- Released January 2010
- Also Known as Lumix DMC-FS33
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 Overview
Let's look more in depth at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Leica and Panasonic. There exists a substantial gap among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and FH22 (14MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and FH22 (1/2.3") provide different sensor measurements.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe M Typ 262 was brought out 5 years later than the FH22 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Panasonic FH22 being a Compact camera.
Before going into a step-by-step comparison, here is a short summation of how the M Typ 262 grades against the FH22 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 262 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22. The entire galleries are provided at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Panasonic FH22 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Panasonic FH22
M Typ 262 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | January 2010 | More recent by 72 months | |
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Panasonic FH22 over the Leica M Typ 262
FH22 | M Typ 262 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Panasonic FH22
M Typ 262 | FH22 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 Physical Comparison
For those who are intending to lug around your camera frequently, you will need to factor in its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 enjoys outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Panasonic FH22 has sizing of 100mm x 57mm x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") with a weight of 170 grams (0.37 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view dimensions comparison of the M Typ 262 and the FH22.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and FH22 is 77 and 94 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it is difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements simply by checking out specifications. The visual here will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and FH22.
To sum up, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M Typ 262 featuring a bigger sensor is going to make shooting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will provide extra detail having its extra 10 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop shots a bit more aggressively. The more modern M Typ 262 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Panasonic FH22 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Panasonic |
Model type | Leica M Typ 262 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-FH22 |
Also Known as | Typ 262 | Lumix DMC-FS33 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2015-11-19 | 2010-01-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Maestro | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4320 x 3240 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 9 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-224mm (8.0x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.3-5.9 |
Macro focusing range | - | 5cm |
Total lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | None |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 60 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/1600 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 5.80 m |
Flash options | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 lbs) | 170g (0.37 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 100 x 57 x 27mm (3.9" x 2.2" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery ID | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail cost | $5,069 | $200 |