Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Released November 2015
- Additionally referred to as Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Launched February 2012
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
In this article, we will be evaluating the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Ricoh. There exists a noticeable gap among the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe M Typ 262 was unveiled 3 years after the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting through a in-depth comparison, below is a short highlight of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Leica M Typ 262 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The full galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
M Typ 262 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2015 | February 2012 | Newer by 47 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Leica M Typ 262
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
M Typ 262 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Lack of selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera, you will need to think about its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 comes with exterior measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has sizing of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that time. Here is the front view over all size comparison of the M Typ 262 versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 77 and 69 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is hard to see the contrast in sensor dimensions simply by seeing a spec sheet. The pic underneath will help offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M Typ 262 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, both the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The M Typ 262 using its bigger sensor will make shooting shallow DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will provide extra detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also make it easier to crop shots far more aggressively. The more recent M Typ 262 will have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Also called as | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2015-11-19 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Maestro | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 855.6mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Maximum resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4928 x 3264 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Min boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Max aperture | - | f/3.5-5.5 |
Number of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Display technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 3.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 550g (1.21 pounds) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $5,069 | $871 |