Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
88 Imaging
53 Features
37 Overall
46
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Other Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28mm (F2.5) lens
- 140g - 113 x 70 x 56mm
- Revealed September 2010
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Overview
On this page, we will be analyzing the Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap between the sensor resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (12MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 (APS-C) posses totally different sensor dimensions.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M Typ 262 was introduced 5 years later than the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 and that is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before we go into a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick introduction of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M Typ 262 & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5. The whole galleries are available at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery & Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
M Typ 262 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | November 2015 | September 2010 | Fresher by 63 months | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 over the Leica M Typ 262
GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5
M Typ 262 | GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Dial precise focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is going to carry your camera, you have to consider its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 262 enjoys physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 has measurements of 113mm x 70mm x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") having a weight of 140 grams (0.31 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Below is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 262 and the GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 is 77 and 88 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Sensor Comparison
Sometimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing simply by looking at a spec sheet. The photograph here might give you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5.
Clearly, each of the cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 262 using its bigger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M Typ 262 will resolve greater detail using its extra 12MP. Higher resolution will also let you crop pictures more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 262 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR GR Lens A12 28mm F2.5 |
Otherwise known as | Typ 262 | - |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-11-19 | 2010-09-21 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Maestro | GR Engine III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 200 | 200 |
RAW files | ||
Minimum boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28mm (1x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/2.5 |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 920 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/3200 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 3.0fps | 5.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | - |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | MPEG-4 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 grams (1.32 pounds) | 140 grams (0.31 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 113 x 70 x 56mm (4.4" x 2.8" x 2.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 320 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Price at launch | $5,069 | $566 |