Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Introduced November 2015
- Other Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Released August 2010
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
Lets look much closer at the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Ricoh. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") offer different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M Typ 262 was unveiled 5 years later than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before delving into a comprehensive comparison, here is a brief view of how the M Typ 262 grades vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M Typ 262 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | November 2015 | August 2010 | Fresher by 65 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Leica M Typ 262
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M Typ 262 | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither comes with Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica M Typ 262 comes with outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") along with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has proportions of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") accompanied by a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Check out the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you choose at the time. Following is a front view measurements comparison of the M Typ 262 and the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 77 and 85 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it's tough to imagine the gap in sensor sizing only by seeing specs. The visual below might give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
As you can plainly see, both cameras feature different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 262 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will produce extra detail having an extra 14 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop pics way more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 262 should have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Otherwise known as | Typ 262 | - |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Introduced | 2015-11-19 | 2010-08-06 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Maestro | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detect focus | ||
Contract detect focus | ||
Phase detect focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus distance | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60s | 30s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 lbs) | 367g (0.81 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 440 pictures |
Battery format | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Retail pricing | $5,069 | $147 |