Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
77 Imaging
72 Features
35 Overall
57
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 6400
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
- Announced November 2015
- Alternate Name is Typ 262
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Launched March 2010
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
In this article, we are analyzing the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, one being a Pro Mirrorless and the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by rivals Leica and Ricoh. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe M Typ 262 was unveiled 5 years later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer the identical body type (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going straight into a step-by-step comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the M Typ 262 grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are viewable at Leica M Typ 262 Gallery and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M Typ 262 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2015 | March 2010 | Fresher by 70 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Leica M Typ 262
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | M Typ 262 |
---|
Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M Typ 262 | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Selfie screen | Neither comes with selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry your camera often, you'll need to consider its weight and proportions. The Leica M Typ 262 comes with outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has measurements of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are using at that moment. The following is the front view size comparison of the M Typ 262 versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the M Typ 262 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 77 and 85 respectively.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Often, it is hard to visualise the difference in sensor sizing merely by going through a spec sheet. The graphic underneath will offer you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M Typ 262 and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
As you can see, both of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 262 having a larger sensor will make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Leica M Typ 262 will provide greater detail having an extra 14MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos far more aggressively. The younger M Typ 262 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M Typ 262 vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica M Typ 262 | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Also called | Typ 262 | - |
Class | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Announced | 2015-11-19 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Maestro | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 35.8 x 23.9mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 855.6mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 5952 x 3976 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 200 | 100 |
RAW images | ||
Lowest boosted ISO | 100 | - |
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 seconds | 180 seconds |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | - | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 lbs) | 355 gr (0.78 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 410 pictures |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | BP-SCL2 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail price | $5,069 | $349 |