Clicky

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20

Portability
77
Imaging
72
Features
35
Overall
57
Leica M Typ 262 front
 
Samsung GX-20 front
Portability
58
Imaging
54
Features
52
Overall
53

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 Key Specs

Leica M Typ 262
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - Full frame Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 200 - 6400
  • Leica M Mount
  • 600g - 139 x 80 x 42mm
  • Launched November 2015
  • Alternative Name is Typ 262
Samsung GX-20
(Full Review)
  • 15MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 3200 (Boost to 6400)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Pentax KAF2 Mount
  • 800g - 142 x 101 x 72mm
  • Announced January 2008
  • Older Model is Samsung GX-10
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 Overview

Here is a complete comparison of the Leica M Typ 262 versus Samsung GX-20, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Leica and Samsung. There exists a large gap between the image resolutions of the M Typ 262 (24MP) and GX-20 (15MP) and the M Typ 262 (Full frame) and GX-20 (APS-C) possess different sensor sizing.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The M Typ 262 was released 7 years later than the GX-20 and that is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Leica M Typ 262 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung GX-20 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before getting through a more detailed comparison, below is a short introduction of how the M Typ 262 scores against the GX-20 in the way of portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica M Typ 262 over the Samsung GX-20

 M Typ 262 GX-20 
AnnouncedNovember 2015January 2008Fresher by 96 months
Display sizing3"2.7"Larger display (+0.3")
Display resolution921k230kSharper display (+691k dot)

Reasons to pick Samsung GX-20 over the Leica M Typ 262

 GX-20 M Typ 262 

Common features in the Leica M Typ 262 and Samsung GX-20

 M Typ 262 GX-20 
Focus manually More exact focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Lacking selfie screen
Touch friendly display Lacking Touch friendly display

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 Physical Comparison

For those who are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you need to consider its weight and volume. The Leica M Typ 262 has got outer dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") having a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Samsung GX-20 has sizing of 142mm x 101mm x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8") along with a weight of 800 grams (1.76 lbs).

Compare the Leica M Typ 262 versus Samsung GX-20 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are employing at that moment. Below is the front view overall size comparison of the M Typ 262 versus the GX-20.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the M Typ 262 and GX-20 is 77 and 58 respectively.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 top view buttons comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 Sensor Comparison

Normally, its tough to visualize the difference between sensor sizing purely by going over specs. The graphic below will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the M Typ 262 and GX-20.

All in all, both the cameras enjoy different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The M Typ 262 because of its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M Typ 262 will offer greater detail as a result of its extra 9 Megapixels. Greater resolution will also let you crop photos far more aggressively. The fresher M Typ 262 should have a benefit with regard to sensor technology.

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 sensor size comparison

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Portrait photography camera
Samsung GX-20 as a Portrait photography camera
75
manual focus
resolution is good (24 megapixels)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
72
has manual focus
decent sensor resolution (15 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Street Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Street photography features
Samsung GX-20 Street photography features
66
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
65
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
no articulating screen
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Sports photography camera
Samsung GX-20 as a Sports photography camera
50
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
no liveview
continuous shooting slow (3.0 fps)
no shutter priority
does not have image stabilization
lacks phase detect autofocus
68
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
slow continuous shooting (3.0 fps)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Travel photography details
Samsung GX-20 Travel photography details
58
resolution is good (24MP)
lack of Timelapse recording
does not have selfie friendly display
64
environment proof
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
flash built-in
does not contain selfie friendly screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Landscape Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 Landscape photography features
Samsung GX-20 Landscape photography features
69
manual focus
interchangeable lenses (Leica M mount)
screen size is good (3")
resolution is good (24MP)
sensor size is big (Full frame)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
71
has manual focus
change lenses (Pentax KAF2 mount)
has image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor resolution (15MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
environment proof
small screen (2.7")
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Leica M Typ 262 as a Vlogging camera
Samsung GX-20 as a Vlogging camera
22
does not have selfie friendly display
does not have image stabilization
video resolution low ( pxls)
lack of external microphone jack
9
no video
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica M Typ 262 vs Samsung GX-20 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica M Typ 262 and Samsung GX-20
 Leica M Typ 262Samsung GX-20
General Information
Company Leica Samsung
Model type Leica M Typ 262 Samsung GX-20
Alternative name Typ 262 -
Category Pro Mirrorless Advanced DSLR
Launched 2015-11-19 2008-01-24
Body design Rangefinder-style mirrorless Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Maestro -
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size Full frame APS-C
Sensor measurements 35.8 x 23.9mm 23.4 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 855.6mm² 365.0mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 15 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 -
Max resolution 5952 x 3976 4688 x 3120
Max native ISO 6400 3200
Max enhanced ISO - 6400
Minimum native ISO 200 100
RAW pictures
Minimum enhanced ISO 100 -
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 11
Lens
Lens support Leica M Pentax KAF2
Available lenses 59 151
Focal length multiplier 1 1.5
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inches 2.7 inches
Resolution of screen 921k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch friendly
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (rangefinder) Optical (pentaprism)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification 0.68x 0.64x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 60 seconds 30 seconds
Fastest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shutter speed 3.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance no built-in flash 13.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash modes no built-in flash Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
External flash
AEB
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash sync - 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Max video resolution - None
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 600 gr (1.32 lbs) 800 gr (1.76 lbs)
Dimensions 139 x 80 x 42mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.7") 142 x 101 x 72mm (5.6" x 4.0" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 68
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.1
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.2
DXO Low light rating not tested 714
Other
Battery ID BP-SCL2 -
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC SD/MMC/SDHC card
Storage slots 1 1
Launch pricing $5,069 $850