Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
78 Imaging
64 Features
30 Overall
50
85 Imaging
34 Features
48 Overall
39
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched June 2011
- Replaced the Leica M9
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 367g - 114 x 58 x 50mm
- Introduced August 2010
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Overview
On this page, we are matching up the Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Leica and Ricoh. There is a sizable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M9-P (18MP) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (10MP) and the M9-P (Full frame) and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC (1/2.3") boast different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe M9-P was brought out 11 months later than the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC and they are both of a similar age. Both of these cameras have the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before getting straight to a complete comparison, here is a concise view of how the M9-P scores vs the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M9-P & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC. The entire galleries are available at Leica M9-P Gallery & Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9-P over the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M9-P | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2011 | August 2010 | More recent by 11 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC over the Leica M9-P
GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | M9-P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Clearer display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M9-P and Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC
M9-P | GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Missing selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Neither provides Touch friendly display |
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to think about its weight and size. The Leica M9-P provides outside dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") and a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC has specifications of 114mm x 58mm x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") with a weight of 367 grams (0.81 lbs).
Contrast the Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the M9-P compared to the GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the M9-P and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC is 78 and 85 respectively.
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's tough to visualize the gap in sensor measurements only by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic below should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the M9-P and GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC.
Clearly, the two cameras have different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The M9-P due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Leica M9-P will show greater detail having its extra 8MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop photos a bit more aggressively. The more recent M9-P provides an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC Specifications
Leica M9-P | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Ricoh |
Model | Leica M9-P | Ricoh GXR P10 28-300mm F3.5-5.6 VC |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Launched | 2011-06-21 | 2010-08-06 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Highest aperture | - | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
Amount of lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 30s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 5.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash options | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 600 gr (1.32 pounds) | 367 gr (0.81 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 58 x 50mm (4.5" x 2.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 68 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 854 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 440 images |
Battery style | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch cost | $7,995 | $147 |