Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
78 Imaging
64 Features
30 Overall
50
85 Imaging
34 Features
44 Overall
38
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 600g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Released June 2011
- Earlier Model is Leica M9
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.7" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 24-72mm (F2.5-4.4) lens
- 355g - 114 x 70 x 44mm
- Announced March 2010
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Overview
Lets look more closely at the Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by brands Leica and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the sensor resolutions of the M9-P (18MP) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (10MP) and the M9-P (Full frame) and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC (1/1.7") offer different sensor dimensions.
Photography GlossaryThe M9-P was unveiled 16 months later than the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC making them a generation apart from each other. Each of these cameras feature the same body design (Rangefinder-style mirrorless).
Before going into a in depth comparison, here is a short overview of how the M9-P grades versus the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica M9-P & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC. The full galleries are available at Leica M9-P Gallery & Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9-P over the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M9-P | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | June 2011 | March 2010 | More recent by 16 months |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC over the Leica M9-P
GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | M9-P | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper display (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M9-P and Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC
M9-P | GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to lug around your camera, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Leica M9-P has got outside measurements of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") with a weight of 600 grams (1.32 lbs) whilst the Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC has specifications of 114mm x 70mm x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") with a weight of 355 grams (0.78 lbs).
See the Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Here is a front view size comparison of the M9-P and the GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
Looking at size and weight, the portability score of the M9-P and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC is 78 and 85 respectively.
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be hard to imagine the difference in sensor measurements just by researching specifications. The visual underneath will offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the M9-P and GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC.
To sum up, both of the cameras come with different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The M9-P having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallow depth of field less difficult and the Leica M9-P will result in more detail having an extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop pics a good deal more aggressively. The more modern M9-P provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M9-P vs Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC Specifications
Leica M9-P | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Ricoh |
Model type | Leica M9-P | Ricoh GXR S10 24-72mm F2.5-4.4 VC |
Type | Pro Mirrorless | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2011-06-21 | 2010-03-18 |
Body design | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/1.7" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 7.44 x 5.58mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 41.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 3200 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 24-72mm (3.0x) |
Largest aperture | - | f/2.5-4.4 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 4.8 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 230k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display technology | TFT color LCD | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 180s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter speed | 2.0fps | 2.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 4.50 m |
Flash settings | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 640x480 |
Video file format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 600g (1.32 pounds) | 355g (0.78 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 114 x 70 x 44mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 68 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.6 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 854 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 images | 410 images |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Price at release | $7,995 | $349 |