Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1
79 Imaging
63 Features
30 Overall
49
88 Imaging
35 Features
51 Overall
41
Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - Full frame Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2500
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- No Video
- Leica M Mount
- 585g - 139 x 80 x 37mm
- Launched September 2009
- Newer Model is Leica M9-P
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/1.63" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 28-112mm (F1.8-2.5) lens
- 275g - 111 x 65 x 42mm
- Launched January 2011
Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1 Overview
In this write-up, we will be matching up the Leica M9 versus Olympus XZ-1, former being a Pro Mirrorless while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Leica and Olympus. There is a substantial difference between the resolutions of the M9 (18MP) and XZ-1 (10MP) and the M9 (Full frame) and XZ-1 (1/1.63") enjoy totally different sensor sizes.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe M9 was manufactured 16 months earlier than the XZ-1 which makes the cameras a generation apart from each other. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Leica M9 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Olympus XZ-1 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a in-depth comparison, below is a quick overview of how the M9 matches up versus the XZ-1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica M9 & Olympus XZ-1. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica M9 Gallery & Olympus XZ-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica M9 over the Olympus XZ-1
M9 | XZ-1 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-1 over the Leica M9
XZ-1 | M9 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2011 | September 2009 | More recent by 16 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer screen (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Leica M9 and Olympus XZ-1
M9 | XZ-1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to lug around your camera often, you have to take into account its weight and volume. The Leica M9 enjoys physical dimensions of 139mm x 80mm x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") accompanied by a weight of 585 grams (1.29 lbs) and the Olympus XZ-1 has sizing of 111mm x 65mm x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") having a weight of 275 grams (0.61 lbs).
Check out the Leica M9 versus Olympus XZ-1 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using at that time. The following is the front view dimension comparison of the M9 compared to the XZ-1.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the M9 and XZ-1 is 79 and 88 respectively.
Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1 Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to see the contrast between sensor measurements only by reading specs. The graphic underneath will offer you a far better sense of the sensor dimensions in the M9 and XZ-1.
All in all, each of the cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The M9 featuring a bigger sensor will make achieving shallower depth of field easier and the Leica M9 will offer you extra detail due to its extra 8MP. Higher resolution can also help you crop shots far more aggressively. The older M9 is going to be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica M9 vs Olympus XZ-1 Specifications
Leica M9 | Olympus XZ-1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica M9 | Olympus XZ-1 |
Category | Pro Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2009-09-09 | 2011-01-26 |
Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | TruePic V |
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/1.63" |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 8.07 x 5.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 44.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18MP | 10MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 5212 x 3472 | 3664 x 2752 |
Highest native ISO | 2500 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | - | 11 |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Leica M | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | - | 28-112mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/1.8-2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | - | 1cm |
Available lenses | 59 | - |
Crop factor | 1 | 4.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 614k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT color LCD | OLED |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (rangefinder) | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.68x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 4 secs | 60 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames/s | 2.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.60 m (ISO 800) |
Flash modes | Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/180 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 585 gr (1.29 lbs) | 275 gr (0.61 lbs) |
Dimensions | 139 x 80 x 37mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 1.5") | 111 x 65 x 42mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 69 | 34 |
DXO Color Depth rating | 22.5 | 18.8 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 11.7 | 10.4 |
DXO Low light rating | 884 | 117 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 320 photos |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | Li-50B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $2,750 | $567 |