Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410
60 Imaging
81 Features
66 Overall
75
77 Imaging
44 Features
35 Overall
40
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Announced October 2020
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 435g - 130 x 91 x 53mm
- Announced June 2007
- Additionally Known as EVOLT E-410
- Replaced the Olympus E-400
- Replacement is Olympus E-420
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410 Overview
Let's take a deeper look at the Leica Q2 Monochrom versus Olympus E-410, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by companies Leica and Olympus. There exists a huge gap among the image resolutions of the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) and E-410 (10MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) and E-410 (Four Thirds) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Fujifilm accuses Eastman Kodak of patent violation in new lawsuitThe Q2 Monochrom was revealed 13 years later than the E-410 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-410 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go straight into a complete comparison, below is a brief highlight of how the Q2 Monochrom grades vs the E-410 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus E-410. The full galleries are viewable at Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery and Olympus E-410 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Olympus E-410
Q2 Monochrom | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | June 2007 | Fresher by 163 months | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 215k | Sharper screen (+825k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-410 over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
E-410 | Q2 Monochrom |
---|
Common features in the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus E-410
Q2 Monochrom | E-410 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410 Physical Comparison
When you are planning to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica Q2 Monochrom provides external measurements of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") along with a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Olympus E-410 has proportions of 130mm x 91mm x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") accompanied by a weight of 435 grams (0.96 lbs).
Examine the Leica Q2 Monochrom versus Olympus E-410 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have attached at the time. Following is the front view scale comparison of the Q2 Monochrom vs the E-410.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the Q2 Monochrom and E-410 is 60 and 77 respectively.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it can be difficult to visualise the gap in sensor sizing just by checking out specifications. The photograph below will help give you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the Q2 Monochrom and E-410.
To sum up, both cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The Q2 Monochrom with its bigger sensor will make getting shallower DOF simpler and the Leica Q2 Monochrom will provide extra detail because of its extra 37 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a little more aggressively. The more recent Q2 Monochrom will have an edge when it comes to sensor tech.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus E-410 Specifications
Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus E-410 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus E-410 |
Also called | - | EVOLT E-410 |
Type | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2020-10-11 | 2007-06-14 |
Body design | Large Sensor Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 100000 | 1600 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 49 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/1.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 45 |
Crop factor | 1 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3" | 2.5" |
Display resolution | 1,040k dot | 215k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100 percent | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 60 secs | 60 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Maximum quiet shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting speed | 20.0 frames per second | 3.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/500 secs | 1/180 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
Highest video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 734 grams (1.62 lb) | 435 grams (0.96 lb) |
Dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 130 x 91 x 53mm (5.1" x 3.6" x 2.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | 51 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 21.1 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 10.0 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 494 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 pictures | - |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $5,995 | - |