Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2
60 Imaging
81 Features
66 Overall
75
88 Imaging
41 Features
51 Overall
45
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Launched October 2020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-600mm (F3.0-6.9) lens
- 271g - 109 x 63 x 42mm
- Announced March 2015
- Old Model is Olympus SH-1
- Newer Model is Olympus SH-3
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2 Overview
Following is a in depth analysis of the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus SH-2, former is a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by competitors Leica and Olympus. There exists a large gap between the resolutions of the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) and SH-2 (16MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) and SH-2 (1/2.3") boast totally different sensor measurements.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe Q2 Monochrom was manufactured 5 years after the SH-2 which is quite a serious difference as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras feature different body design with the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus SH-2 being a Compact camera.
Before delving straight to a comprehensive comparison, here is a quick highlight of how the Q2 Monochrom matches up versus the SH-2 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica Q2 Monochrom & Olympus Stylus SH-2. The entire galleries are available at Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery & Olympus SH-2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Olympus SH-2
Q2 Monochrom | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | March 2015 | More modern by 69 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Display resolution | 1040k | 460k | Clearer display (+580k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus SH-2 over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
SH-2 | Q2 Monochrom |
---|
Common features in the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus SH-2
Q2 Monochrom | SH-2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display measurements | |
Selfie screen | Neither features selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is looking to carry around your camera, you'll have to factor its weight and proportions. The Leica Q2 Monochrom enjoys external dimensions of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") having a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs) whilst the Olympus SH-2 has measurements of 109mm x 63mm x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") having a weight of 271 grams (0.60 lbs).
Check out the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Olympus SH-2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at that moment. Below is a front view dimension comparison of the Q2 Monochrom versus the SH-2.
Using dimensions and weight, the portability score of the Q2 Monochrom and SH-2 is 60 and 88 respectively.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizes merely by going over a spec sheet. The image below will help provide you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the Q2 Monochrom and SH-2.
Clearly, both of the cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizes. The Q2 Monochrom due to its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Leica Q2 Monochrom will offer you more detail due to its extra 31MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The fresher Q2 Monochrom will have a benefit in sensor innovation.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Olympus SH-2 Specifications
Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus Stylus SH-2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica Q2 Monochrom | Olympus Stylus SH-2 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2020-10-11 | 2015-03-11 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VII |
Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
Sensor size | Full frame | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 36 x 24mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 864.0mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Max resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 100000 | 6400 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 125 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | 25-600mm (24.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/1.7 | f/3.0-6.9 |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | 3cm |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Fastest silent shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shutter rate | 20.0 frames per second | 11.5 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | 8.30 m (at ISO 3200) |
Flash settings | no built-in flash | Auto, redeye reduction, fill-in, off |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 30p), 1280 x 720 (30p), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 734 grams (1.62 lbs) | 271 grams (0.60 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 109 x 63 x 42mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 photos | 380 photos |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | LI-92B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD, SDHC, SDXC, Internal Memory |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $5,995 | $399 |