Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill
60 Imaging
81 Features
66 Overall
75
57 Imaging
56 Features
45 Overall
51
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 47MP - Full frame Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 100000
- Optical Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- 28mm (F1.7) lens
- 734g - 130 x 80 x 92mm
- Introduced October 2020
(Full Review)
- 15MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- No Video
- Sigma SA Mount
- 790g - 146 x 113 x 80mm
- Announced April 2012
- Superseded the Sigma SD1
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Overview
Let's look a bit more closely at the Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the latter is a Advanced DSLR by companies Leica and Sigma. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the Q2 Monochrom (47MP) and SD1 Merrill (15MP) and the Q2 Monochrom (Full frame) and SD1 Merrill (APS-C) enjoy different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe Q2 Monochrom was brought out 8 years later than the SD1 Merrill and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Leica Q2 Monochrom being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma SD1 Merrill being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before we go through a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the Q2 Monochrom matches up against the SD1 Merrill in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Leica Q2 Monochrom and Sigma SD1 Merrill. The entire galleries are viewable at Leica Q2 Monochrom Gallery and Sigma SD1 Merrill Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica Q2 Monochrom over the Sigma SD1 Merrill
Q2 Monochrom | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | October 2020 | April 2012 | More recent by 104 months | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 460k | Sharper screen (+580k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Sigma SD1 Merrill over the Leica Q2 Monochrom
SD1 Merrill | Q2 Monochrom |
---|
Common features in the Leica Q2 Monochrom and Sigma SD1 Merrill
Q2 Monochrom | SD1 Merrill | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very precise focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen size | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen |
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to lug around your camera often, you need to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica Q2 Monochrom has got outer measurements of 130mm x 80mm x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") having a weight of 734 grams (1.62 lbs) and the Sigma SD1 Merrill has proportions of 146mm x 113mm x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") having a weight of 790 grams (1.74 lbs).
Take a look at the Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into account, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. The following is the front view size comparison of the Q2 Monochrom versus the SD1 Merrill.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the Q2 Monochrom and SD1 Merrill is 60 and 57 respectively.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it can be tough to picture the difference between sensor measurements only by reading through specs. The visual underneath will help give you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the Q2 Monochrom and SD1 Merrill.
As you can plainly see, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor measurements. The Q2 Monochrom due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower depth of field less difficult and the Leica Q2 Monochrom will give extra detail having its extra 32 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also allow you to crop photographs a little more aggressively. The newer Q2 Monochrom provides an advantage with regard to sensor innovation.
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica Q2 Monochrom vs Sigma SD1 Merrill Specifications
Leica Q2 Monochrom | Sigma SD1 Merrill | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Leica | Sigma |
Model type | Leica Q2 Monochrom | Sigma SD1 Merrill |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Advanced DSLR |
Introduced | 2020-10-11 | 2012-04-10 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Dual True II |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS (Foveon X3) |
Sensor size | Full frame | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 36 x 24mm | 24 x 16mm |
Sensor surface area | 864.0mm² | 384.0mm² |
Sensor resolution | 47 megapixels | 15 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Full resolution | 8368 x 5584 | 4800 x 3200 |
Max native ISO | 100000 | 6400 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 49 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sigma SA |
Lens zoom range | 28mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/1.7 | - |
Macro focusing range | 17cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 76 |
Focal length multiplier | 1 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 1,040 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Optical (pentaprism) |
Viewfinder resolution | 3,680 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | 96% |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.76x | 0.64x |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 60 secs | - |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | - |
Highest silent shutter speed | 1/40000 secs | - |
Continuous shooting rate | 20.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Flash modes | no built-in flash | no built-in flash |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/500 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 4096 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | - |
Max video resolution | 4096x2160 | None |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 734g (1.62 lbs) | 790g (1.74 lbs) |
Dimensions | 130 x 80 x 92mm (5.1" x 3.1" x 3.6") | 146 x 113 x 80mm (5.7" x 4.4" x 3.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 350 shots | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | BP-SCL4 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Compact Flash (Type I, UDMA compatible) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $5,995 | $2,339 |