Leica TL vs Samsung SL202
85 Imaging
60 Features
58 Overall
59
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Leica TL vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 12500
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Leica L Mount
- 384g - 134 x 69 x 33mm
- Introduced November 2016
- New Model is Leica TL2
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Additionally referred to as PL50
YouTube trialing AI that fast-forwards to the best video segments Leica TL vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Following is a extended review of the Leica TL versus Samsung SL202, one is a Advanced Mirrorless and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by brands Leica and Samsung. There is a significant difference between the sensor resolutions of the TL (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) and the TL (APS-C) and SL202 (1/2.3") feature totally different sensor size.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe TL was unveiled 7 years after the SL202 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Leica TL being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before getting in to a more detailed comparison, below is a concise overview of how the TL scores against the SL202 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Leica TL vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica TL and Samsung SL202. The full galleries are provided at Leica TL Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica TL over the Samsung SL202
| TL | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | November 2016 |  | February 2009 | More modern by 95 months |
| Manually focus |  | More exact focus | ||
| Display sizing | 3.7" |  | 2.7" | Larger display (+1") |
| Display resolution | 1230k |  | 230k | Crisper display (+1000k dot) |
| Touch display |  | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Leica TL
| SL202 | TL |
|---|
Common features in the Leica TL and Samsung SL202
| TL | SL202 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen |
Leica TL vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you're going to have to take into account its weight and dimensions. The Leica TL has got external dimensions of 134mm x 69mm x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") having a weight of 384 grams (0.85 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") along with a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Leica TL versus Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that moment. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the TL and the SL202.
Considering size and weight, the portability score of the TL and SL202 is 85 and 94 respectively.
Leica TL vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizes merely by checking technical specs. The pic underneath should offer you a far better sense of the sensor sizes in the TL and SL202.
As you can tell, each of the cameras enjoy different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The TL having a larger sensor will make getting shallow DOF simpler and the Leica TL will give you extra detail having an extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also make it easier to crop pics far more aggressively. The younger TL will have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Leica TL vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsStreet Comparison
Supernova astonishes astronomers in ancient 12th century observationsSports Comparison
Photography GlossaryTravel Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsLandscape Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthVlogging Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
Leica TL vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
| Leica TL | Samsung SL202 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Leica | Samsung |
| Model | Leica TL | Samsung SL202 |
| Also called | - | PL50 |
| Class | Advanced Mirrorless | Small Sensor Compact |
| Introduced | 2016-11-08 | 2009-02-17 |
| Physical type | Rangefinder-style mirrorless | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
| Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.7mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
| Sensor area | 370.5mm² | 27.7mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 10 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4928 x 3264 | 3648 x 2736 |
| Maximum native ISO | 12500 | 1600 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW files | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Leica L | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
| Largest aperture | - | f/2.8-5.7 |
| Macro focus range | - | 5cm |
| Available lenses | 4 | - |
| Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.9 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3.7" | 2.7" |
| Display resolution | 1,230k dots | 230k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Electronic (optional) | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/1500 secs |
| Continuous shutter rate | 5.0 frames per second | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.50 m (at ISO 100) | 4.60 m |
| Flash options | Auto, auto w/redeye reduction, on, off, slow sync, slow sync w/redeye reduction | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
| External flash | ||
| AE bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Optional | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 384 gr (0.85 lb) | 168 gr (0.37 lb) |
| Dimensions | 134 x 69 x 33mm (5.3" x 2.7" x 1.3") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 400 photos | - |
| Battery style | Battery Pack | - |
| Battery model | BP-DC13 | SLB-10A |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | Internal + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Retail pricing | $1,009 | $140 |
