Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II
91 Imaging
35 Features
33 Overall
34
68 Imaging
60 Features
93 Overall
73
Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-300mm (F3.3-4.9) lens
- 218g - 103 x 60 x 33mm
- Announced April 2010
(Full Review)
- 20MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- No Anti-Alias Filter
- 1/8000s Max Shutter
- 4096 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 574g - 134 x 91 x 67mm
- Announced September 2016
- Superseded the Olympus E-M1
- Updated by Olympus E-M1 III
Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II Overview
Its time to look a little more closely at the Leica V-Lux 20 and Olympus E-M1 II, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Pro Mirrorless by brands Leica and Olympus. There is a sizeable difference between the sensor resolutions of the V-Lux 20 (12MP) and E-M1 II (20MP) and the V-Lux 20 (1/2.3") and E-M1 II (Four Thirds) boast totally different sensor dimensions.
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe V-Lux 20 was manufactured 7 years prior to the E-M1 II and that is quite a large gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras feature different body design with the Leica V-Lux 20 being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-M1 II being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before we go into a step-by-step comparison, here is a quick overview of how the V-Lux 20 scores versus the E-M1 II with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Leica V-Lux 20 and Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II. The entire galleries are available at Leica V-Lux 20 Gallery and Olympus E-M1 II Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica V-Lux 20 over the Olympus E-M1 II
V-Lux 20 | E-M1 II |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M1 II over the Leica V-Lux 20
E-M1 II | V-Lux 20 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | September 2016 | April 2010 | Fresher by 78 months | |
Manual focus | More precise focusing | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 1037k | 461k | Sharper display (+576k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies | |||
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica V-Lux 20 and Olympus E-M1 II
V-Lux 20 | E-M1 II | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display size | 3" | 3" | Same display sizing |
Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II Physical Comparison
If you are going to carry your camera frequently, you will need to consider its weight and measurements. The Leica V-Lux 20 enjoys outer dimensions of 103mm x 60mm x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 218 grams (0.48 lbs) and the Olympus E-M1 II has proportions of 134mm x 91mm x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") along with a weight of 574 grams (1.27 lbs).
Compare the Leica V-Lux 20 and Olympus E-M1 II in the all new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you have at that time. Below is a front view size comparison of the V-Lux 20 compared to the E-M1 II.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the V-Lux 20 and E-M1 II is 91 and 68 respectively.
Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II Sensor Comparison
Usually, it is very difficult to see the gap between sensor sizing only by going over specs. The visual below may offer you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the V-Lux 20 and E-M1 II.
All in all, both cameras come with different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The V-Lux 20 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting bokeh more difficult and the Olympus E-M1 II will offer you extra detail due to its extra 8 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The older V-Lux 20 is going to be disadvantaged with regard to sensor technology.
Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica V-Lux 20 vs Olympus E-M1 II Specifications
Leica V-Lux 20 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model | Leica V-Lux 20 | Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Pro Mirrorless |
Announced | 2010-04-20 | 2016-09-19 |
Physical type | Compact | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12MP | 20MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 5184 x 3888 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 64 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Number of focus points | 11 | 121 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | - |
Highest aperture | f/3.3-4.9 | - |
Macro focus distance | 3cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Display diagonal | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 461k dots | 1,037k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.74x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 60s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/8000s |
Fastest quiet shutter speed | - | 1/32000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 2.0 frames per second | 60.0 frames per second |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 5.30 m | 9.10 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow Syncro | Redeye, Fill-in, Flash Off, Red-eye Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(1st curtain), Slow sync.(2nd curtain), Manual |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 (60 fps), 848 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 4096 x 2160 @ 24p / 237 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM, 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 4096x2160 |
Video format | Motion JPEG | MOV, H.264 |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 218 grams (0.48 pounds) | 574 grams (1.27 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 103 x 60 x 33mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 134 x 91 x 67mm (5.3" x 3.6" x 2.6") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | 80 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 23.7 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 12.8 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 1312 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 350 photos |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | - | BLH-1 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | Dual SD/SDHC/SDXC slots |
Card slots | Single | Two |
Retail cost | $779 | $1,700 |