Clicky

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330

Portability
64
Imaging
60
Features
52
Overall
56
Leica X-U front
 
Olympus E-330 front
Portability
65
Imaging
41
Features
40
Overall
40

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 Key Specs

Leica X-U
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 100 - 12500
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 35mm (F1.7-16.0) lens
  • 635g - 140 x 79 x 88mm
  • Launched January 2016
  • Also Known as Typ 113
Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
  • 7MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 2.5" Tilting Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Boost to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 616g - 140 x 87 x 72mm
  • Released March 2006
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-330
  • Superseded the Olympus E-300
  • Later Model is Olympus E-450
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 Overview

Below is a detailed assessment of the Leica X-U versus Olympus E-330, one being a Large Sensor Compact and the other is a Advanced DSLR by rivals Leica and Olympus. There exists a big gap among the sensor resolutions of the X-U (16MP) and E-330 (7MP) and the X-U (APS-C) and E-330 (Four Thirds) come with different sensor size.

Photography Glossary

The X-U was released 9 years later than the E-330 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Leica X-U being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-330 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a simple introduction of how the X-U grades versus the E-330 in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica X-U over the Olympus E-330

 X-U E-330 
ReleasedJanuary 2016March 2006More recent by 120 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedTiltingFully Articulating display
Display dimension3"2.5"Larger display (+0.5")
Display resolution920k215kCrisper display (+705k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-330 over the Leica X-U

 E-330 X-U 

Common features in the Leica X-U and Olympus E-330

 X-U E-330 
Manual focus Dial precise focusing
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly display Neither contains Touch friendly display

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 Physical Comparison

If you are aiming to lug around your camera, you have to think about its weight and measurements. The Leica X-U has got exterior measurements of 140mm x 79mm x 88mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 3.5") having a weight of 635 grams (1.40 lbs) while the Olympus E-330 has proportions of 140mm x 87mm x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8") having a weight of 616 grams (1.36 lbs).

Check the Leica X-U versus Olympus E-330 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Don't forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are using during that time. Following is the front view proportions comparison of the X-U against the E-330.

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 size comparison

Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the X-U and E-330 is 64 and 65 respectively.

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 top view buttons comparison

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 Sensor Comparison

Typically, its hard to picture the gap in sensor measurements merely by seeing specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the X-U and E-330.

As you can plainly see, the two cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The X-U featuring a larger sensor is going to make achieving shallow DOF easier and the Leica X-U will provide more detail as a result of its extra 9MP. Greater resolution will help you crop images much more aggressively. The newer X-U provides a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 sensor size comparison

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 Screen and ViewFinder

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica X-U Portrait photography information
Olympus E-330 Portrait photography information
76
you can focus manually
MP count decent (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
54
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
low resolution (7 megapixels)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Street Comparison

Leica X-U Street photography information
Olympus E-330 Street photography information
64
screen articulates
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition (635g)
60
has a tilting screen
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
lighter than others (616 grams)
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Leica X-U as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-330 as a Sports photography camera
55
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
weather proofing
better than average battery pack (450 CIPA)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
max frames per second low (5.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
has no phase detect autofocus
40
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
has phase detect auto focus
painfully slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (7 megapixels)
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Travel Comparison

Leica X-U Travel photography information
Olympus E-330 Travel photography information
62
better than average battery pack (450 CIPA)
weather proofing
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
fast max aperture (f1.7)
lack of Time Lapse mode
heavier than competition (635 grams)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
50
lighter than others (616 grams)
built-in flash
no Timelapse recording
low resolution (7 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Leica X-U as a Landscape photography camera
Olympus E-330 as a Landscape photography camera
63
you can focus manually
fast max aperture (f1.7)
pretty good screen size (3")
MP count decent (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
weather proofing
better than average battery pack (450 CIPA)
can't switch lenses (fixed lens mount)
focal length is fixed (35mm)
lack of image stabilization
lack of Time Lapse mode
45
focusing manually
interchangeable lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.5")
does not have image stabilization
low resolution (7MP)
low maximum ISO (400)
no Timelapse recording
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Leica X-U Vlogging information
Olympus E-330 Vlogging information
25
fast max aperture (f1.7)
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
does not offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of mic socket
heavier than competition (635g)
9
no video
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Leica X-U vs Olympus E-330 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica X-U and Olympus E-330
 Leica X-UOlympus E-330
General Information
Manufacturer Leica Olympus
Model type Leica X-U Olympus E-330
Also called as Typ 113 EVOLT E-330
Class Large Sensor Compact Advanced DSLR
Launched 2016-01-20 2006-03-18
Body design Large Sensor Compact Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Sensor type CMOS CMOS
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor measurements 23.6 x 15.7mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 370.5mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 7 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 3136 x 2352
Highest native ISO 12500 400
Highest boosted ISO - 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW files
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 11 3
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Micro Four Thirds
Lens zoom range 35mm (1x) -
Maximum aperture f/1.7-16.0 -
Number of lenses - 45
Crop factor 1.5 2.1
Screen
Range of display Fully Articulated Tilting
Display size 3 inches 2.5 inches
Display resolution 920 thousand dot 215 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.47x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30s 60s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 2.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Automatic, automatic/red eye reduction, on, on/red eye reduction, long-term synchronization/red eye reduction, off Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync - 1/180s
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (30p) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video format MPEG-4 -
Microphone jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 635 grams (1.40 lbs) 616 grams (1.36 lbs)
Dimensions 140 x 79 x 88mm (5.5" x 3.1" x 3.5") 140 x 87 x 72mm (5.5" x 3.4" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 450 photos -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID BP-DC8 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse shooting
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card
Storage slots One One
Pricing at launch $3,495 $1,100