Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2
89 Imaging
52 Features
33 Overall
44
89 Imaging
53 Features
63 Overall
57
Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- 35mm (F2.8) lens
- 306g - 124 x 60 x 32mm
- Launched December 2009
- Renewed by Leica X2
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 269g - 110 x 64 x 34mm
- Launched May 2013
- Older Model is Olympus E-PM1
Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2 Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Leica X1 and Olympus E-PM2, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by companies Leica and Olympus. There is a large difference between the resolutions of the X1 (12MP) and E-PM2 (16MP) and the X1 (APS-C) and E-PM2 (Four Thirds) use totally different sensor measurements.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe X1 was announced 4 years earlier than the E-PM2 and that is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Leica X1 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Olympus E-PM2 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting through a full comparison, below is a concise overview of how the X1 matches up against the E-PM2 with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2 Gallery
Here is a sample of the gallery pictures for Leica X1 & Olympus PEN E-PM2. The whole galleries are available at Leica X1 Gallery & Olympus E-PM2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Leica X1 over the Olympus E-PM2
X1 | E-PM2 |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-PM2 over the Leica X1
E-PM2 | X1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | May 2013 | December 2009 | Fresher by 41 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
Display resolution | 460k | 230k | Crisper display (+230k dot) | |
Touch display | Easily navigate |
Common features in the Leica X1 and Olympus E-PM2
X1 | E-PM2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | More exact focus | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither has selfie screen |
Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2 Physical Comparison
For those who are going to carry your camera regularly, you are going to need to factor its weight and volume. The Leica X1 has exterior dimensions of 124mm x 60mm x 32mm (4.9" x 2.4" x 1.3") and a weight of 306 grams (0.67 lbs) and the Olympus E-PM2 has sizing of 110mm x 64mm x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") having a weight of 269 grams (0.59 lbs).
Compare the Leica X1 and Olympus E-PM2 in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have at the time. Following is the front view measurements comparison of the X1 and the E-PM2.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the X1 and E-PM2 is 89 and 89 respectively.
Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, its hard to visualise the difference between sensor sizing merely by going over specifications. The photograph below will offer you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the X1 and E-PM2.
Plainly, each of these cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The X1 having a larger sensor will make getting shallower depth of field easier and the Olympus E-PM2 will deliver extra detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop photos much more aggressively. The older X1 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Leica X1 vs Olympus E-PM2 Specifications
Leica X1 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Leica | Olympus |
Model type | Leica X1 | Olympus PEN E-PM2 |
Category | Large Sensor Compact | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Launched | 2009-12-18 | 2013-05-21 |
Physical type | Large Sensor Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest Possible resolution | 4272 x 2856 | 4608 x 3456 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 25600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 35 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens zoom range | 35mm (1x) | - |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8 | - |
Macro focusing range | 30cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.7" | 3" |
Resolution of screen | 230k dots | 460k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30s | 60s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 3.0 frames per sec | 8.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 7.00 m (bundled FL-LM1) |
Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync, Studio | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync, Manual (3 levels) |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/250s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | - | MPEG-4, H.264, Motion JPEG |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 306 grams (0.67 pounds) | 269 grams (0.59 pounds) |
Dimensions | 124 x 60 x 32mm (4.9" x 2.4" x 1.3") | 110 x 64 x 34mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 72 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 22.7 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.2 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 932 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 360 images |
Style of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | BLS-5 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC card | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $1,495 | $448 |