Clicky

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro

Portability
83
Imaging
57
Features
37
Overall
49
Leica X2 front
 
Sigma sd Quattro front
Portability
63
Imaging
69
Features
56
Overall
63

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro Key Specs

Leica X2
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 12500
  • No Video
  • 36mm (F2.8) lens
  • 345g - 124 x 69 x 52mm
  • Released May 2012
  • Replaced the Leica X1
  • Refreshed by Leica X Vario
Sigma Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 29MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • Sigma SA Mount
  • 625g - 147 x 95 x 91mm
  • Launched February 2016
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro Overview

Lets look closer at the Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro, former being a Large Sensor Compact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Leica and Sigma. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the X2 (16MP) and Quattro (29MP) but both cameras provide the identical sensor sizes (APS-C).

Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

The X2 was brought out 4 years before the Quattro and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Leica X2 being a Large Sensor Compact camera and the Sigma Quattro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.

Before going into a in-depth comparison, here is a simple introduction of how the X2 matches up against the Quattro with regard to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Leica X2 over the Sigma Quattro

 X2 Quattro 

Reasons to pick Sigma Quattro over the Leica X2

 Quattro X2 
LaunchedFebruary 2016May 2012Fresher by 46 months
Screen size3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution1620k230kSharper screen (+1390k dot)

Common features in the Leica X2 and Sigma Quattro

 X2 Quattro 
Focus manually Very exact focusing
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Absent Touch friendly screen

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro Physical Comparison

If you're going to carry your camera regularly, you need to factor in its weight and measurements. The Leica X2 has exterior measurements of 124mm x 69mm x 52mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 2.0") along with a weight of 345 grams (0.76 lbs) while the Sigma Quattro has proportions of 147mm x 95mm x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6") accompanied by a weight of 625 grams (1.38 lbs).

Analyze the Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Do not forget, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilising at that moment. Following is a front view overall size comparison of the X2 compared to the Quattro.

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability score of the X2 and Quattro is 83 and 63 respectively.

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro top view buttons comparison

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro Sensor Comparison

Typically, its difficult to picture the gap in sensor sizing simply by looking through specs. The visual underneath will give you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the X2 and Quattro.

All in all, the 2 cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different megapixels. You can count on the Sigma Quattro to render more detail having its extra 13 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots way more aggressively. The older X2 will be behind when it comes to sensor technology.

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro sensor size comparison

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Leica X2 Portrait photography info
Sigma Quattro Portrait photography info
74
you can focus manually
MP count good (16MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
comes with face detect autofocus
supports RAW files
81
has manual focus
amazing resolution (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has face detection autofocus
saves RAW formats
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Street Comparison

Leica X2 Street photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Street photography highlights
65
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
screen is fixed
no image stabilization
59
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
no articulating screen
lack of image stabilization
heavier than competition (625 grams)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Leica X2 Sports photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Sports photography highlights
49
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
better than average battery pack (450 per charge)
can't change focal length (36mm)
continuous shooting slow (5.0 fps)
no image stabilization
no phase detect autofocus
70
amazing resolution (29MP)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
has tracking autofocus
environment proof
supports phase detect autofocus
continuous shooting slow (3.8 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Leica X2 Travel photography highlights
Sigma Quattro Travel photography highlights
64
better than average battery pack (450 per charge)
MP count good (16MP)
has built in flash
doesn't have Timelapse recording
display isn't selfie friendly
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
55
environment proof
amazing resolution (29 megapixels)
missing Time Lapse recording
heavier than competition (625g)
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Leica X2 Landscape photography features
Sigma Quattro Landscape photography features
53
you can focus manually
MP count good (16 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW files
better than average battery pack (450 per charge)
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (36mm)
slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
small screen (2.7")
no image stabilization
doesn't have Timelapse recording
72
has manual focus
switch lenses (Sigma SA mount)
screen size is good (3")
amazing resolution (29 megapixels)
sensor size is good (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
environment proof
lack of image stabilization
missing Time Lapse recording
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Vlogging Comparison

Leica X2 as a Vlogging camera
Sigma Quattro as a Vlogging camera
9
can't shoot video
22
has face detection autofocus
doesn't contain selfie friendly display
lack of image stabilization
video quality not great ( resolution)
missing external mic port
heavier than competition (625 grams)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Leica X2 vs Sigma Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Leica X2 and Sigma Quattro
 Leica X2Sigma sd Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Leica Sigma
Model type Leica X2 Sigma sd Quattro
Class Large Sensor Compact Advanced Mirrorless
Released 2012-05-10 2016-02-23
Body design Large Sensor Compact Rangefinder-style mirrorless
Sensor Information
Powered by - Dual TRUE III
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size APS-C APS-C
Sensor dimensions 23.6 x 15.8mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor surface area 372.9mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 16MP 29MP
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 and 16:9 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Highest resolution 4928 x 3264 5424 x 3616
Highest native ISO 12500 6400
Min native ISO 100 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Autofocus single
Autofocus tracking
Autofocus selectice
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Live view autofocus
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points 11 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sigma SA
Lens zoom range 36mm (1x) -
Maximum aperture f/2.8 -
Macro focusing distance 30cm -
Number of lenses - 76
Focal length multiplier 1.5 1.5
Screen
Display type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 2.7 inch 3 inch
Resolution of display 230k dot 1,620k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Electronic (optional) Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,360k dot
Viewfinder coverage - 100 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 30 secs 30 secs
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shooting speed 5.0 frames/s 3.8 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - no built-in flash
Flash modes Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Front Curtain, Rear Curtain, Slow sync, Studio no built-in flash
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Highest video resolution None -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 345 grams (0.76 pounds) 625 grams (1.38 pounds)
Physical dimensions 124 x 69 x 52mm (4.9" x 2.7" x 2.0") 147 x 95 x 91mm (5.8" x 3.7" x 3.6")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 450 pictures -
Style of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID - BP-61
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC card SD/SDHC/SDXC
Storage slots 1 1
Retail cost $994 $738