Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS
93 Imaging
46 Features
33 Overall
40
90 Imaging
40 Features
43 Overall
41
Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 20MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Digital Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F3.2-6.5) lens
- 164g - 95 x 60 x 29mm
- Revealed January 2015
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-100mm (F2.0-4.9) lens
- 235g - 124 x 64 x 33mm
- Announced February 2014
- Renewed by Ricoh WG-5 GPS
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Overview
Here, we will be analyzing the Nikon L32 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Waterproof by competitors Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a considerable gap among the resolutions of the L32 (20MP) and WG-4 GPS (16MP) but both cameras have the identical sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe L32 was manufactured 12 months after the WG-4 GPS so they are of a similar age. Both cameras feature different body design with the Nikon L32 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh WG-4 GPS being a Compact camera.
Before delving right into a comprehensive comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the L32 grades against the WG-4 GPS for portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix L32 & Ricoh WG-4 GPS. The entire galleries are available at Nikon L32 Gallery & Ricoh WG-4 GPS Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon L32 over the Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| L32 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2015 |  | February 2014 | More modern by 12 months |
| Selfie screen |  | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-4 GPS over the Nikon L32
| WG-4 GPS | L32 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually |  | More exact focusing | ||
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon L32 and Ricoh WG-4 GPS
| L32 | WG-4 GPS | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Screen size | 3" |  | 3" | Same screen dimensions |
| Touch screen |  | Lack of Touch screen |
Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to carry around your camera frequently, you'll have to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon L32 has physical measurements of 95mm x 60mm x 29mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 164 grams (0.36 lbs) whilst the Ricoh WG-4 GPS has sizing of 124mm x 64mm x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") accompanied by a weight of 235 grams (0.52 lbs).
See the Nikon L32 versus Ricoh WG-4 GPS in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Remember that, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are working with at the time. Here is a front view dimensions comparison of the L32 vs the WG-4 GPS.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the L32 and WG-4 GPS is 93 and 90 respectively.
Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Sensor Comparison
Normally, its difficult to imagine the contrast in sensor sizes simply by viewing specifications. The image underneath will help offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the L32 and WG-4 GPS.
To sum up, both cameras feature the identical sensor size albeit different MP. You can count on the Nikon L32 to result in more detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs way more aggressively. The newer L32 provides an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photography GlossaryStreet Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneLandscape Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsVlogging Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes
Nikon L32 vs Ricoh WG-4 GPS Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix L32 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix L32 | Ricoh WG-4 GPS |
| Category | Ultracompact | Waterproof |
| Revealed | 2015-01-14 | 2014-02-05 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 20 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 5152 x 3864 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 1600 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Center weighted autofocus | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detect autofocus | ||
| Contract detect autofocus | ||
| Phase detect autofocus | ||
| Total focus points | - | 9 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 26-130mm (5.0x) | 25-100mm (4.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-6.5 | f/2.0-4.9 |
| Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 230k dots | 460k dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Display tech | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4s | 4s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/4000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | - | 2.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Custom white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 4.30 m | 10.00 m (Auto ISO) |
| Flash options | - | Auto, flash off, flash on, auto + redeye, on + redeye |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720 | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1280x720 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | Motion JPEG | H.264 |
| Microphone port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental sealing | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 164 grams (0.36 pounds) | 235 grams (0.52 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 95 x 60 x 29mm (3.7" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 124 x 64 x 33mm (4.9" x 2.5" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 320 pictures | 240 pictures |
| Battery type | AA | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | 2 x AA | D-LI92 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 secs) | Yes (2 or 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC, internal |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail cost | $120 | $210 |
