Clicky

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200

Portability
92
Imaging
36
Features
44
Overall
39
Nikon Coolpix P300 front
 
Sony Alpha DSLR-A200 front
Portability
66
Imaging
50
Features
38
Overall
45

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 Key Specs

Nikon P300
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 160 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 24-100mm (F1.8-4.9) lens
  • 189g - 103 x 58 x 32mm
  • Announced May 2011
  • Newer Model is Nikon P310
Sony A200
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 2.7" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 3200
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • No Video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 572g - 131 x 99 x 71mm
  • Introduced July 2008
  • Later Model is Sony A230
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 Overview

Below, we will be looking at the Nikon P300 versus Sony A200, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by manufacturers Nikon and Sony. The resolution of the P300 (12MP) and the A200 (10MP) is relatively comparable but the P300 (1/2.3") and A200 (APS-C) possess totally different sensor sizing.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

The P300 was brought out 2 years later than the A200 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon P300 being a Compact camera and the Sony A200 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before diving through a step-by-step comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the P300 scores vs the A200 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon P300 over the Sony A200

 P300 A200 
IntroducedMay 2011July 2008More recent by 35 months
Screen dimension3"2.7"Bigger screen (+0.3")
Screen resolution922k230kCrisper screen (+692k dot)

Reasons to pick Sony A200 over the Nikon P300

 A200 P300 
Focus manually Dial precise focusing

Common features in the Nikon P300 and Sony A200

 P300 A200 
Screen typeFixed Fixed Fixed screen
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch friendly screen Missing Touch friendly screen

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 Physical Comparison

For anyone who is planning to lug around your camera often, you will want to factor its weight and volume. The Nikon P300 has got outside dimensions of 103mm x 58mm x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") having a weight of 189 grams (0.42 lbs) whilst the Sony A200 has sizing of 131mm x 99mm x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8") having a weight of 572 grams (1.26 lbs).

Take a look at the Nikon P300 versus Sony A200 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ depending on the lens you have at that moment. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the P300 compared to the A200.

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 size comparison

Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P300 and A200 is 92 and 66 respectively.

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 top view buttons comparison

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is difficult to visualise the difference in sensor measurements just by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a better sense of the sensor sizes in the P300 and A200.

As you can see, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor measurements. The P300 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow depth of field tougher and the Nikon P300 will provide greater detail having its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will make it easier to crop pictures much more aggressively. The younger P300 is going to have an edge with regard to sensor innovation.

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 sensor size comparison

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon P300 Portrait photography advice
Sony A200 Portrait photography advice
28
provides face detection focusing
lack of manual focus
can't use external flash
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
54
focusing manually
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (10 megapixels)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Nikon P300 Street photography highlights
Sony A200 Street photography highlights
56
has image stabilization (Optical)
screen is fixed
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
66
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
fixed screen
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Nikon P300 Sports photography information
Sony A200 Sports photography information
38
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides tracking autofocus
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of phase detect AF
50
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
has phase detect autofocus
no liveview
low fps (3.0 fps)
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Nikon P300 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A200 as a Travel photography camera
64
built-in flash
relatively wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
no Time Lapse mode
megapixel count low (12MP)
display isn't selfie friendly
46
flash built-in
lack of Time Lapse recording
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
doesn't feature selfie friendly screen
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon P300
Landscape photography with Sony A200
43
relatively wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
screen size is good (3 inches)
has image stabilization (Optical)
lack of manual focus
cannot change lens (fixed lens mount)
megapixel count low (12 megapixels)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
lack of RAW support
no Time Lapse mode
54
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
image stabilization (Sensor based)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW formats
small screen (2.7 inches)
no liveview
sensor resolution not great (10MP)
lack of Time Lapse recording
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon P300 Vlogging information
Sony A200 Vlogging information
36
relatively wide (24mm)
very good maximum aperture (f1.8)
has image stabilization (Optical)
provides face detection focusing
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
display isn't selfie friendly
no external mic port
9
no video shooting
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Nikon P300 vs Sony A200 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon P300 and Sony A200
 Nikon Coolpix P300Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
General Information
Manufacturer Nikon Sony
Model type Nikon Coolpix P300 Sony Alpha DSLR-A200
Category Small Sensor Compact Entry-Level DSLR
Announced 2011-05-31 2008-07-17
Body design Compact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Chip Expeed C2 -
Sensor type BSI-CMOS CCD
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.6 x 15.8mm
Sensor surface area 28.1mm² 372.9mm²
Sensor resolution 12 megapixels 10 megapixels
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 -
Full resolution 4000 x 3000 3872 x 2592
Max native ISO 3200 3200
Min native ISO 160 100
RAW format
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Touch focus
Continuous AF
Single AF
Tracking AF
AF selectice
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points 9 9
Lens
Lens support fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 24-100mm (4.2x) -
Max aperture f/1.8-4.9 -
Macro focusing range 3cm -
Total lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.8 1.5
Screen
Range of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen size 3 inch 2.7 inch
Resolution of screen 922k dot 230k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT-LCD with anti-reflection coating -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage - 95 percent
Viewfinder magnification - 0.55x
Features
Slowest shutter speed 8s 30s
Maximum shutter speed 1/2000s 1/4000s
Continuous shooting speed 7.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Expose Manually
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Set WB
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance 6.50 m 12.00 m (at ISO 100)
Flash options Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain, wireless
Hot shoe
Auto exposure bracketing
White balance bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (15, 30fps), 1280 x 720p (15, 30, 60 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 120 fps) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format H.264, Motion JPEG -
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environment seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 189 gr (0.42 pounds) 572 gr (1.26 pounds)
Dimensions 103 x 58 x 32mm (4.1" x 2.3" x 1.3") 131 x 99 x 71mm (5.2" x 3.9" x 2.8")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested 63
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 22.3
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 11.3
DXO Low light rating not tested 521
Other
Battery life 240 images -
Battery form Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL12 -
Self timer Yes (10 or 2 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage media SD/SDHC/SDXC Compact Flash
Storage slots Single Single
Pricing at launch $500 $100