Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2
66 Imaging
42 Features
51 Overall
45
93 Imaging
32 Features
35 Overall
33
Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 18MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1000mm (F3.0-5.9) lens
- 550g - 125 x 84 x 102mm
- Introduced January 2013
- Previous Model is Nikon P510
- Refreshed by Nikon P530
(Full Review)
- 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
- 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
- Launched August 2009
Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview
Here is a thorough assessment of the Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2, both Small Sensor Superzoom digital cameras by brands Nikon and Ricoh. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the P520 (18MP) and CX2 (9MP) but they possess the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe P520 was introduced 3 years later than the CX2 and that is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon P520 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight into a thorough comparison, below is a quick introduction of how the P520 grades vs the CX2 for portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 Gallery
Below is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P520 & Ricoh CX2. The whole galleries are available at Nikon P520 Gallery & Ricoh CX2 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P520 over the Ricoh CX2
P520 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | January 2013 | August 2009 | Fresher by 42 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen sizing | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Crisper screen (+1k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Nikon P520
CX2 | P520 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P520 and Ricoh CX2
P520 | CX2 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | More exact focus | |||
Touch friendly screen | Neither offers Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is intending to carry your camera, you should factor in its weight and volume. The Nikon P520 offers external measurements of 125mm x 84mm x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") accompanied by a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has sizing of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an ILC will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing at the time. Underneath is the front view proportions comparison of the P520 compared to the CX2.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P520 and CX2 is 66 and 93 respectively.
Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is hard to visualise the gap between sensor sizing just by looking at specs. The visual below might offer you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the P520 and CX2.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit not the same MP. You can count on the Nikon P520 to give extra detail using its extra 9 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop pictures far more aggressively. The newer P520 is going to have an advantage in sensor tech.
Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P520 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P520 | Ricoh CX2 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P520 | Ricoh CX2 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Introduced | 2013-01-29 | 2009-08-20 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 6.16 x 4.62mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.5mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 18 megapixels | 9 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Maximum resolution | 4896 x 3672 | 3456 x 2592 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-1000mm (41.7x) | 28-300mm (10.7x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.0-5.9 | f/3.5-5.6 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of screen | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 8 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | - | 3.00 m (ISO 400) |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
Mic jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | none | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 550 grams (1.21 lbs) | 185 grams (0.41 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 84 x 102mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.0") | 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 200 pictures | - |
Battery form | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL5 | DB-70 |
Self timer | - | Yes (2, 10 or Custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC card, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch cost | $380 | $341 |