Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160
65 Imaging
40 Features
57 Overall
46
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1440mm (F3.3-6.5) lens
- 565g - 125 x 85 x 107mm
- Introduced February 2014
- Replacement is Nikon P610
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Revealed January 2012
Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
Let's look a bit more in depth at the Nikon P600 versus Olympus VG-160, former being a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. The sensor resolution of the P600 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is pretty comparable and they feature the same exact sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe P600 was manufactured 2 years later than the VG-160 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon P600 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before getting straight into a complete comparison, below is a short view of how the P600 scores vs the VG-160 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P600 & Olympus VG-160. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon P600 Gallery & Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P600 over the Olympus VG-160
P600 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2014 | January 2012 | More recent by 26 months | |
Manually focus | More exact focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon P600
VG-160 | P600 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P600 and Olympus VG-160
P600 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent screen measurement | |
Touch screen | Missing Touch screen |
Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to lug around your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and proportions. The Nikon P600 provides outside dimensions of 125mm x 85mm x 107mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.2") along with a weight of 565 grams (1.25 lbs) while the Olympus VG-160 has measurements of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon P600 versus Olympus VG-160 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you choose at that time. Following is the front view measurement comparison of the P600 against the VG-160.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the P600 and VG-160 is 65 and 96 respectively.
Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is difficult to imagine the gap in sensor measurements only by going through technical specs. The photograph underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizes in the P600 and VG-160.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy the same exact sensor sizing albeit different resolution. You can expect the Nikon P600 to show greater detail due to its extra 2 Megapixels. Higher resolution will allow you to crop shots far more aggressively. The fresher P600 provides an edge in sensor innovation.
Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P600 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P600 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P600 | Olympus VG-160 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Introduced | 2014-02-07 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Max boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-1440mm (60.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.3-6.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 7cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch capability | ||
Screen tech | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 15 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 7.50 m | 4.80 m |
Flash options | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/100/30/25p) | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 565 gr (1.25 lbs) | 125 gr (0.28 lbs) |
Dimensions | 125 x 85 x 107mm (4.9" x 3.3" x 4.2") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 330 shots | 165 shots |
Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL23 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $750 | $90 |