Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000
52 Imaging
41 Features
63 Overall
49
96 Imaging
35 Features
14 Overall
26
Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Raise to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Launched March 2015
- Replacement is Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- 640 x 480 video
- 27-108mm (F3.2-5.9) lens
- 116g - 94 x 56 x 19mm
- Released February 2010
Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 Overview
Its time to look a bit more in depth at the Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact and both of them are offered by Nikon. There is a sizeable difference among the sensor resolutions of the P900 (16MP) and S3000 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor size (1/2.3").
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe P900 was revealed 5 years later than the S3000 and that is a fairly large gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Nikon P900 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Nikon S3000 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a complete comparison, below is a brief overview of how the P900 scores versus the S3000 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P900 and Nikon Coolpix S3000. The full galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery and Nikon S3000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Nikon S3000
P900 | S3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | March 2015 | February 2010 | More recent by 62 months | |
Manual focus | Dial accurate focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimension | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Nikon S3000 over the Nikon P900
S3000 | P900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Nikon S3000
P900 | S3000 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch screen | Neither offers Touch screen |
Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to lug around your camera, you are going to need to think about its weight and size. The Nikon P900 offers exterior dimensions of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") accompanied by a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) while the Nikon S3000 has specifications of 94mm x 56mm x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 116 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will differ based on the lens you have chosen during that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the P900 compared to the S3000.
Using size and weight, the portability rating of the P900 and S3000 is 52 and 96 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 Sensor Comparison
Generally, it can be tough to envision the difference in sensor measurements purely by seeing technical specs. The graphic underneath will help give you a greater sense of the sensor sizes in the P900 and S3000.
As you can tell, the two cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon P900 to show extra detail because of its extra 4MP. Higher resolution will also help you crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The younger P900 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P900 vs Nikon S3000 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P900 | Nikon Coolpix S3000 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Nikon |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Nikon Coolpix S3000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Launched | 2015-03-02 | 2010-02-03 |
Physical type | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed C2 | Expeed C2 |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Highest enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 27-108mm (4.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/3.2-5.9 |
Macro focus range | 1cm | 8cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.7" |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 230 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dots | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 15s | 8s |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shutter rate | 7.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in, Slow Syncro |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 899 grams (1.98 lbs) | 116 grams (0.26 lbs) |
Dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 94 x 56 x 19mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 images | - |
Battery type | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL23 | EN-EL10 |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch price | $600 | $150 |