Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145
52 Imaging
41 Features
63 Overall
49
96 Imaging
37 Features
24 Overall
31
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Boost to 12800)
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 899g - 140 x 103 x 137mm
- Revealed March 2015
- Replacement is Nikon P1000
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 120g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced July 2011
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145 Overview
Below, we will be comparing the Nikon P900 versus Olympus VG-145, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the P900 (16MP) and the VG-145 (14MP) is pretty similar and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Google AI Gemini Could Enhance iPhone Experience, Talks SuggestThe P900 was revealed 3 years later than the VG-145 and that is quite a sizable gap as far as technology is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon P900 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VG-145 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go in to a thorough comparison, below is a quick summary of how the P900 scores against the VG-145 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix P900 and Olympus VG-145. The full galleries are provided at Nikon P900 Gallery and Olympus VG-145 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P900 over the Olympus VG-145
P900 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | March 2015 | July 2011 | More recent by 44 months | |
Manual focus | Dial exact focus | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Crisper screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-145 over the Nikon P900
VG-145 | P900 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P900 and Olympus VG-145
P900 | VG-145 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen sizing | |
Touch friendly screen | Neither comes with Touch friendly screen |
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145 Physical Comparison
For anyone who is going to lug around your camera often, you'll need to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon P900 comes with physical dimensions of 140mm x 103mm x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") along with a weight of 899 grams (1.98 lbs) while the Olympus VG-145 has proportions of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") and a weight of 120 grams (0.26 lbs).
Look at the Nikon P900 versus Olympus VG-145 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you are utilising at the time. Below is the front view measurement comparison of the P900 compared to the VG-145.
Considering dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the P900 and VG-145 is 52 and 96 respectively.
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it's tough to imagine the gap between sensor measurements purely by reading a spec sheet. The graphic here may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the P900 and VG-145.
Clearly, both of those cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit different resolution. You should expect the Nikon P900 to offer you greater detail because of its extra 2MP. Higher resolution will help you crop shots much more aggressively. The newer P900 should have an advantage in sensor tech.
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P900 vs Olympus VG-145 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P900 | Olympus VG-145 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P900 | Olympus VG-145 |
Type | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-03-02 | 2011-07-27 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | TruePic III |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 14MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Maximum boosted ISO | 12800 | - |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW images | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing range | 1cm | 1cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Display sizing | 3 inch | 3 inch |
Display resolution | 921 thousand dot | 230 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 921 thousand dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 15 seconds | 4 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.40 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 50p, 30p, 25p) 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15fps) |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Yes | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 899 grams (1.98 pounds) | 120 grams (0.26 pounds) |
Dimensions | 140 x 103 x 137mm (5.5" x 4.1" x 5.4") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 360 photos | 160 photos |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL23 | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage media | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Retail cost | $600 | $0 |