Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
96 Imaging
38 Features
26 Overall
33
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Revealed January 2020
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 1280 x 720 video
- 26-130mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 125g - 96 x 57 x 19mm
- Introduced January 2012
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160 Overview
The following is a thorough assessment of the Nikon P950 and Olympus VG-160, one is a Small Sensor Superzoom and the other is a Small Sensor Compact by companies Nikon and Olympus. The image resolution of the P950 (16MP) and the VG-160 (14MP) is fairly well matched and they possess the exact same sensor dimensions (1/2.3").
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe P950 was announced 8 years after the VG-160 which is quite a sizable gap as far as tech is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Olympus VG-160 being a Compact camera.
Before we go in to a full comparison, below is a brief introduction of how the P950 grades against the VG-160 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix P950 and Olympus VG-160. The whole galleries are provided at Nikon P950 Gallery and Olympus VG-160 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Olympus VG-160
P950 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | January 2020 | January 2012 | Newer by 98 months | |
Manually focus | Very precise focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display dimension | 3.2" | 3" | Larger display (+0.2") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus VG-160 over the Nikon P950
VG-160 | P950 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Olympus VG-160
P950 | VG-160 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly display | Lacking Touch friendly display |
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160 Physical Comparison
When you are intending to travel with your camera regularly, you'll have to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon P950 offers exterior measurements of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") and a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) whilst the Olympus VG-160 has sizing of 96mm x 57mm x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") accompanied by a weight of 125 grams (0.28 lbs).
Examine the Nikon P950 and Olympus VG-160 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary based on the lens you are working with during that time. Below is the front view size comparison of the P950 compared to the VG-160.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability grade of the P950 and VG-160 is 52 and 96 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, its difficult to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions simply by checking specs. The picture below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the P950 and VG-160.
As you can plainly see, each of the cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements but not the same megapixels. You should anticipate the Nikon P950 to resolve extra detail with its extra 2MP. Greater resolution can also allow you to crop pics much more aggressively. The more modern P950 is going to have an edge in sensor technology.
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P950 vs Olympus VG-160 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P950 | Olympus VG-160 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Olympus VG-160 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
Revealed | 2020-01-07 | 2012-01-10 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 3216 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW format | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Cross type focus points | - | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
Max aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | f/2.8-6.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 7cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2 inch | 3 inch |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | None |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 300 secs | 4 secs |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash distance | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.80 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1280 x 720 (30,15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 180 (30,15 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 1005 gr (2.22 lb) | 125 gr (0.28 lb) |
Dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 96 x 57 x 19mm (3.8" x 2.2" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 photographs | 165 photographs |
Style of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | - | LI-70B |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $797 | $90 |