Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1
52 Imaging
43 Features
70 Overall
53
87 Imaging
52 Features
54 Overall
52
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.2" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-2000mm (F2.8-6.5) lens
- 1005g - 140 x 110 x 150mm
- Released January 2020
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 12800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 318g - 116 x 68 x 39mm
- Announced February 2012
- Refreshed by Panasonic GX7
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 Overview
Following is a thorough analysis of the Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by rivals Nikon and Panasonic. The image resolution of the P950 (16MP) and the GX1 (16MP) is relatively close but the P950 (1/2.3") and GX1 (Four Thirds) offer totally different sensor measurements.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe P950 was manufactured 8 years after the GX1 which is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of these cameras have different body design with the Nikon P950 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera and the Panasonic GX1 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight to a step-by-step comparison, here is a concise overview of how the P950 matches up versus the GX1 when considering portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix P950 & Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon P950 Gallery & Panasonic GX1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon P950 over the Panasonic GX1
P950 | GX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | January 2020 | February 2012 | More modern by 97 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3.2" | 3" | Bigger screen (+0.2") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Crisper screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Panasonic GX1 over the Nikon P950
GX1 | P950 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon P950 and Panasonic GX1
P950 | GX1 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing |
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 Physical Comparison
For anybody who is aiming to carry around your camera regularly, you will want to factor its weight and dimensions. The Nikon P950 comes with exterior measurements of 140mm x 110mm x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") along with a weight of 1005 grams (2.22 lbs) while the Panasonic GX1 has dimensions of 116mm x 68mm x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") having a weight of 318 grams (0.70 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you have chosen at the time. Below is a front view overall size comparison of the P950 versus the GX1.
Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability rating of the P950 and GX1 is 52 and 87 respectively.
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very hard to see the difference in sensor sizes just by looking through specs. The pic below might provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the P950 and GX1.
All in all, both cameras provide the same resolution albeit not the same sensor sizes. The P950 has the smaller sensor which will make obtaining bokeh more challenging. The fresher P950 is going to have a benefit when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon P950 vs Panasonic GX1 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix P950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Panasonic |
Model | Nikon Coolpix P950 | Panasonic Lumix DMC-GX1 |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2020-01-07 | 2012-02-14 |
Body design | SLR-like (bridge) | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | - | Venus Engine FHD |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4592 x 3448 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 12800 |
Min native ISO | 100 | 160 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Autofocus selectice | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Live view autofocus | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Number of focus points | - | 23 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 24-2000mm (83.3x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/2.8-6.5 | - |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | - |
Number of lenses | - | 107 |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.2 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | - | TFT Color LCD with wide-viewing angle |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Electronic | Electronic (optional) |
Viewfinder resolution | 2,359k dot | - |
Viewfinder coverage | 90 percent | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 300s | 60s |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | 4.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | 11.50 m (at Auto ISO) | 7.60 m |
Flash options | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Highest flash sync | - | 1/160s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC3840 x 2160 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 60p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 50p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC1920 x 1080 @ 25p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30fps), 320 x 240 (30fps) |
Max video resolution | 3840x2160 | 1920x1080 |
Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
Microphone jack | ||
Headphone jack | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | EN-EL20a lithium-ion battery & USB charger | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 1005g (2.22 pounds) | 318g (0.70 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 140 x 110 x 150mm (5.5" x 4.3" x 5.9") | 116 x 68 x 39mm (4.6" x 2.7" x 1.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 20.8 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.6 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 703 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 290 pictures | 300 pictures |
Type of battery | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $797 | $228 |