Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
69 Imaging
57 Features
45 Overall
52
Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Released February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-85mm (F3.5-5.5) lens
- 550g - 114 x 75 x 93mm
- Introduced February 2012
Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Overview
Lets take a deeper look at the Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5, former is a Ultracompact while the latter is a Advanced Mirrorless by manufacturers Nikon and Ricoh. There is a large difference between the image resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (16MP) and the S220 (1/2.3") and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 (APS-C) use totally different sensor sizing.
Ulanzi's Tripod Ensures Ultra Smooth FilmingThe S220 was manufactured 4 years earlier than the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 which is quite a serious difference as far as tech is concerned. Both of the cameras offer different body type with the Nikon S220 being a Ultracompact camera and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before getting straight into a comprehensive comparison, below is a brief overview of how the S220 matches up versus the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S220 & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5. The entire galleries are viewable at Nikon S220 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
S220 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
---|
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 over the Nikon S220
GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | S220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | February 2012 | February 2009 | Newer by 36 months | |
Manually focus | More precise focusing | |||
Screen sizing | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 920k | 230k | Sharper screen (+690k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S220 and Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5
S220 | GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly screen | Absent Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Physical Comparison
For those who are planning to travel with your camera, you will want to take into account its weight and size. The Nikon S220 offers external dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") along with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 has specifications of 114mm x 75mm x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") along with a weight of 550 grams (1.21 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 in our newest Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an ILC will change depending on the lens you are using during that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the S220 and the GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability grade of the S220 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 is 97 and 69 respectively.
Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Sensor Comparison
Often, its hard to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions only by going over a spec sheet. The pic underneath will provide you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S220 and GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5.
As you can see, each of these cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor dimensions. The S220 featuring a tinier sensor will make getting shallower depth of field harder and the Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 will offer extra detail due to its extra 6MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop shots a little more aggressively. The more aged S220 is going to be behind with regard to sensor technology.
Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S220 vs Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S220 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S220 | Ricoh GXR A16 24-85mm F3.5-5.5 |
Type | Ultracompact | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2009-02-03 | 2012-02-02 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | - | Smooth Imaging Engine IV |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 16 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4928 x 3264 |
Max native ISO | 2000 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 80 | 200 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Autofocus single | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection autofocus | ||
Contract detection autofocus | ||
Phase detection autofocus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 24-85mm (3.5x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/3.5-5.5 |
Macro focus range | 10cm | - |
Focal length multiplier | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5" | 3" |
Screen resolution | 230k dots | 920k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen technology | - | TFT color LCD |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 8s | 180s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000s | 1/3200s |
Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Set white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) |
Max video resolution | 640x480 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4 |
Mic port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 lb) | 550 grams (1.21 lb) |
Dimensions | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 114 x 75 x 93mm (4.5" x 3.0" x 3.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 400 shots |
Form of battery | - | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL10 | DB-90 |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Pricing at launch | $56 | $871 |