Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
59 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 20-1200mm (F2.8-5.9) lens
- 708g - 119 x 122 x 99mm
- Announced January 2014
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F, former is a Ultracompact while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Samsung. There is a considerable difference between the image resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and WB2200F (16MP) but they feature the exact same sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Photography GlossaryThe S220 was announced 5 years prior to the WB2200F which is quite a large difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Nikon S220 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung WB2200F being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before we go through a detailed comparison, below is a quick synopsis of how the S220 scores against the WB2200F with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S220 & Samsung WB2200F. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S220 Gallery & Samsung WB2200F Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Samsung WB2200F
| S220 | WB2200F |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung WB2200F over the Nikon S220
| WB2200F | S220 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Announced | January 2014 |  | February 2009 | Newer by 59 months |
| Manual focus |  | Dial precise focus | ||
| Display dimension | 3" |  | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") |
| Display resolution | 460k |  | 230k | Clearer display (+230k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S220 and Samsung WB2200F
| S220 | WB2200F | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Neither has selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Neither has Touch friendly display |
Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F Physical Comparison
For anybody who is looking to travel with your camera frequently, you will have to factor its weight and measurements. The Nikon S220 has physical measurements of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") with a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Samsung WB2200F has proportions of 119mm x 122mm x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") having a weight of 708 grams (1.56 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Keep in mind, the weight of an ILC will vary dependant on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the S220 against the WB2200F.
Considering size and weight, the portability rating of the S220 and WB2200F is 97 and 59 respectively.
Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is difficult to picture the gap between sensor dimensions merely by reading specs. The pic underneath will offer you a greater sense of the sensor sizing in the S220 and WB2200F.
As you can plainly see, both of those cameras posses the exact same sensor measurements but different MP. You can expect to see the Samsung WB2200F to deliver more detail with its extra 6 Megapixels. Greater resolution will enable you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The more aged S220 is going to be behind when it comes to sensor tech.
Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F Screen and ViewFinder
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesLandscape Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S220 vs Samsung WB2200F Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S220 | Samsung WB2200F | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Nikon | Samsung |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S220 | Samsung WB2200F |
| Class | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2009-02-03 | 2014-01-07 |
| Physical type | Ultracompact | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 27.7mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 10MP | 16MP |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Maximum resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Maximum native ISO | 2000 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 80 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Autofocus touch | ||
| Continuous autofocus | ||
| Single autofocus | ||
| Autofocus tracking | ||
| Selective autofocus | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Autofocus multi area | ||
| Autofocus live view | ||
| Face detection autofocus | ||
| Contract detection autofocus | ||
| Phase detection autofocus | ||
| Cross focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | 20-1200mm (60.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | f/2.8-5.9 |
| Macro focus distance | 10cm | 10cm |
| Crop factor | 5.9 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Screen technology | - | TFT LCD |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
| Features | ||
| Slowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 1/8 seconds |
| Maximum shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting rate | 11.0 frames per second | 8.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Inbuilt flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 6.00 m (ISO Auto) |
| Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash Off, Red-eye fix |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920x1080(30fps), 1280x720(30fps), 640x480(30fps), QVGA(30fps, 30s, Streaming) * High Speed : 360fps(176x128), 240fps(384x288) |
| Maximum video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 100 gr (0.22 lb) | 708 gr (1.56 lb) |
| Dimensions | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 119 x 122 x 99mm (4.7" x 4.8" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | EN-EL10 | BP-1410 |
| Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | - |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD, SDHC, SCXC |
| Card slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at launch | $56 | $599 |
