Clicky

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65

Portability
97
Imaging
33
Features
11
Overall
24
Nikon Coolpix S220 front
 
Sony SLT-A65 front
Portability
64
Imaging
64
Features
85
Overall
72

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Key Specs

Nikon S220
(Full Review)
  • 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 2.5" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 80 - 2000
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
  • 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
  • Introduced February 2009
Sony A65
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Screen
  • ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
  • Sensor based Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
  • 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
  • Launched November 2011
  • Replacement is Sony A68
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Overview

On this page, we will be comparing the Nikon S220 vs Sony A65, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Nikon and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and A65 (24MP) and the S220 (1/2.3") and A65 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The S220 was launched 3 years earlier than the A65 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Nikon S220 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.

Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S220 matches up against the A65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Sony A65

 S220 A65 

Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Nikon S220

 A65 S220 
LaunchedNovember 2011February 2009Fresher by 33 months
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Screen typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating screen
Screen dimensions3"2.5"Bigger screen (+0.5")
Screen resolution921k230kClearer screen (+691k dot)
Selfie screen Take selfies

Common features in the Nikon S220 and Sony A65

 S220 A65 
Touch friendly screen Lack of Touch friendly screen

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison

If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S220 enjoys external dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).

Check the Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the S220 against the A65.

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 size comparison

Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S220 and A65 is 97 and 64 respectively.

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 top view buttons comparison

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison

Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S220 and A65.

As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S220 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A65 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older S220 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 sensor size comparison

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photography Glossary

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Portrait photography with Nikon S220
Portrait photography with Sony A65
19
lack of manual focus
no manual control
no external flash support
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
78
focusing manually
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detection focus
delivers RAW formats
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Nikon S220 as a Street photography camera
Sony A65 as a Street photography camera
48
fixed screen
no image stabilization
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
77
screen articulates fully
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Sports Comparison

Nikon S220 Sports photography features
Sony A65 Sports photography features
16
no shutter priority
no image stabilization
MP count low (10 megapixels)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
82
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
good sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking autofocus
supports phase detect auto focus
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Travel Comparison

Nikon S220 as a Travel photography camera
Sony A65 as a Travel photography camera
52
built-in flash
missing Timelapse mode
MP count low (10MP)
does not have selfie friendly display
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
68
sensor resolution is decent (24MP)
built-in flash
selfie friendly screen
missing Timelapse mode
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Nikon S220 Landscape photography features
Sony A65 Landscape photography features
22
lack of manual focus
can't switch lens (fixed lens mount)
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
tiny screen (2.5 inch)
no manual control
no image stabilization
MP count low (10MP)
tiny sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
missing Timelapse mode
75
focusing manually
swap lenses (Sony/Minolta Alpha mount)
screen size is decent (3 inches)
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
sensor resolution is decent (24 megapixels)
good sensor size (APS-C)
delivers RAW formats
missing Timelapse mode
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S220 Vlogging info
Sony A65 Vlogging info
22
wide angle not fantastic (35mm)
sluggish maximum aperture (f3.1)
does not have selfie friendly display
no image stabilization
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external microphone port
78
selfie friendly screen
built in image stabilization (Sensor based)
offers face detection focus
video res high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
comes with external microphone support
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S220 and Sony A65
 Nikon Coolpix S220Sony SLT-A65
General Information
Make Nikon Sony
Model type Nikon Coolpix S220 Sony SLT-A65
Category Ultracompact Entry-Level DSLR
Introduced 2009-02-03 2011-11-15
Physical type Ultracompact Compact SLR
Sensor Information
Chip - Bionz
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor measurements 6.08 x 4.56mm 23.5 x 15.6mm
Sensor area 27.7mm² 366.6mm²
Sensor resolution 10 megapixel 24 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 and 16:9 3:2 and 16:9
Peak resolution 3648 x 2736 6000 x 4000
Highest native ISO 2000 12800
Highest enhanced ISO - 25600
Min native ISO 80 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Touch focus
Continuous AF
AF single
Tracking AF
Selective AF
Center weighted AF
AF multi area
AF live view
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Total focus points - 15
Cross type focus points - 3
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens Sony/Minolta Alpha
Lens zoom range 35-105mm (3.0x) -
Largest aperture f/3.1-5.9 -
Macro focusing range 10cm -
Amount of lenses - 143
Crop factor 5.9 1.5
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fully Articulated
Screen diagonal 2.5 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 230 thousand dots 921 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None Electronic
Viewfinder resolution - 2,359 thousand dots
Viewfinder coverage - 100%
Viewfinder magnification - 0.73x
Features
Minimum shutter speed 8 secs 30 secs
Fastest shutter speed 1/2000 secs 1/4000 secs
Continuous shutter rate 11.0fps 10.0fps
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom WB
Image stabilization
Inbuilt flash
Flash distance - 10.00 m
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless
Hot shoe
AE bracketing
White balance bracketing
Fastest flash synchronize - 1/160 secs
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Video resolutions 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps)
Highest video resolution 640x480 1920x1080
Video file format Motion JPEG MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264
Microphone support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless None Eye-Fi Connected
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 100 grams (0.22 pounds) 622 grams (1.37 pounds)
Physical dimensions 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested 74
DXO Color Depth rating not tested 23.4
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested 12.6
DXO Low light rating not tested 717
Other
Battery life - 560 images
Battery style - Battery Pack
Battery ID EN-EL10 NP-FM500H
Self timer Yes (3 or 10 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage SD/SDHC, Internal SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo
Card slots Single Single
Cost at release $56 $700