Nikon S220 vs Sony A65
97 Imaging
33 Features
11 Overall
24
64 Imaging
64 Features
85 Overall
72
Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 2000
- 640 x 480 video
- 35-105mm (F3.1-5.9) lens
- 100g - 90 x 56 x 18mm
- Introduced February 2009
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 12800 (Expand to 25600)
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Sony/Minolta Alpha Mount
- 622g - 132 x 97 x 81mm
- Launched November 2011
- Replacement is Sony A68
Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Overview
On this page, we will be comparing the Nikon S220 vs Sony A65, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Entry-Level DSLR by brands Nikon and Sony. There exists a crucial gap among the sensor resolutions of the S220 (10MP) and A65 (24MP) and the S220 (1/2.3") and A65 (APS-C) provide totally different sensor sizing.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S220 was launched 3 years earlier than the A65 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have different body design with the Nikon S220 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sony A65 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go right into a detailed comparison, here is a concise synopsis of how the S220 matches up against the A65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S220 and Sony SLT-A65. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S220 Gallery and Sony A65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S220 over the Sony A65
S220 | A65 |
---|
Reasons to pick Sony A65 over the Nikon S220
A65 | S220 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Launched | November 2011 | February 2009 | Fresher by 33 months | |
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen dimensions | 3" | 2.5" | Bigger screen (+0.5") | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Common features in the Nikon S220 and Sony A65
S220 | A65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Touch friendly screen | Lack of Touch friendly screen |
Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Physical Comparison
If you are looking to carry your camera regularly, you will need to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S220 enjoys external dimensions of 90mm x 56mm x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") having a weight of 100 grams (0.22 lbs) and the Sony A65 has measurements of 132mm x 97mm x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") with a weight of 622 grams (1.37 lbs).
Check the Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Keep in mind, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change depending on the lens you are employing during that time. Here is a front view over all size comparison of the S220 against the A65.
Factoring in dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S220 and A65 is 97 and 64 respectively.
Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to envision the difference in sensor sizing purely by researching a spec sheet. The photograph below should give you a stronger sense of the sensor dimensions in the S220 and A65.
As you can see, both of those cameras provide different megapixels and different sensor sizing. The S220 featuring a smaller sensor will make getting shallower DOF trickier and the Sony A65 will provide you with extra detail utilizing its extra 14 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop shots more aggressively. The older S220 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S220 vs Sony A65 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S220 | Sony SLT-A65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Sony |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S220 | Sony SLT-A65 |
Category | Ultracompact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Introduced | 2009-02-03 | 2011-11-15 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | Bionz |
Sensor type | CCD | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor measurements | 6.08 x 4.56mm | 23.5 x 15.6mm |
Sensor area | 27.7mm² | 366.6mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixel | 24 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 3:2 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 3648 x 2736 | 6000 x 4000 |
Highest native ISO | 2000 | 12800 |
Highest enhanced ISO | - | 25600 |
Min native ISO | 80 | 100 |
RAW support | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Total focus points | - | 15 |
Cross type focus points | - | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | Sony/Minolta Alpha |
Lens zoom range | 35-105mm (3.0x) | - |
Largest aperture | f/3.1-5.9 | - |
Macro focusing range | 10cm | - |
Amount of lenses | - | 143 |
Crop factor | 5.9 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fully Articulated |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dots | 921 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch functionality | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,359 thousand dots |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 100% |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.73x |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 8 secs | 30 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/4000 secs |
Continuous shutter rate | 11.0fps | 10.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 10.00 m |
Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye reduction, Off, On, Slow sync | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, High Speed Sync, Rear Curtain, Fill-in, Wireless |
Hot shoe | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Fastest flash synchronize | - | 1/160 secs |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (60, 24 fps), 1440 x 1080 (30fps), 640 x 424 (29.97 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 640x480 | 1920x1080 |
Video file format | Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, AVCHD, H.264 |
Microphone support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 100 grams (0.22 pounds) | 622 grams (1.37 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 90 x 56 x 18mm (3.5" x 2.2" x 0.7") | 132 x 97 x 81mm (5.2" x 3.8" x 3.2") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | 74 |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | 23.4 |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | 12.6 |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | 717 |
Other | ||
Battery life | - | 560 images |
Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL10 | NP-FM500H |
Self timer | Yes (3 or 10 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC, Internal | SD/SDHC/SDXC/Memory Stick Pro Duo/ Pro-HG Duo |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at release | $56 | $700 |