Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300
94 Imaging
38 Features
37 Overall
37
91 Imaging
41 Features
44 Overall
42
Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.6) lens
- 160g - 93 x 58 x 26mm
- Released August 2011
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Revealed May 2017
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 Overview
Below is a comprehensive overview of the Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300, one being a Small Sensor Compact and the other is a Waterproof and they are both produced by Nikon. The sensor resolution of the S6200 (16MP) and the W300 (16MP) is very close and both cameras have the same sensor sizes (1/2.3").
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsThe S6200 was introduced 6 years prior to the W300 and that is a fairly significant gap as far as camera tech is concerned. Each of these cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go right into a complete comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S6200 matches up versus the W300 in relation to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S6200 and Nikon Coolpix W300. The whole galleries are available at Nikon S6200 Gallery and Nikon W300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6200 over the Nikon W300
| S6200 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Focus manually | More accurate focus |
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Nikon S6200
| W300 | S6200 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | May 2017 | August 2011 | More recent by 70 months | |
| Display dimensions | 3" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.3") | |
| Display resolution | 921k | 230k | Sharper display (+691k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon S6200 and Nikon W300
| S6200 | W300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Neither offers selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 Physical Comparison
When you are going to lug around your camera regularly, you will need to consider its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6200 offers outer dimensions of 93mm x 58mm x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") along with a weight of 160 grams (0.35 lbs) whilst the Nikon W300 has measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") along with a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 in the latest Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is a front view measurement comparison of the S6200 versus the W300.

Taking into consideration size and weight, the portability score of the S6200 and W300 is 94 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it is very difficult to picture the difference in sensor measurements purely by looking through technical specs. The photograph below might provide you a better sense of the sensor dimensions in the S6200 and W300.
As you can tell, each of the cameras provide the same sensor dimensions and the same exact resolution and you should expect comparable quality of photographs but you have to factor the release date of the cameras into account. The older S6200 will be behind with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 Screen and ViewFinder
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideTravel Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S6200 vs Nikon W300 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand Name | Nikon | Nikon |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6200 | Nikon Coolpix W300 |
| Class | Small Sensor Compact | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-08-24 | 2017-05-31 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | CCD | - |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16MP | 16MP |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 |
| Max resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Max native ISO | 3200 | 6400 |
| Minimum native ISO | 80 | 125 |
| RAW data | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Autofocus continuous | ||
| Autofocus single | ||
| Tracking autofocus | ||
| Autofocus selectice | ||
| Autofocus center weighted | ||
| Multi area autofocus | ||
| Live view autofocus | ||
| Face detection focus | ||
| Contract detection focus | ||
| Phase detection focus | ||
| Cross type focus points | - | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
| Highest aperture | f/3.2-5.6 | f/2.8-4.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 10cm | 1cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen size | 2.7 inches | 3 inches |
| Screen resolution | 230 thousand dot | 921 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch screen | ||
| Screen technology | TFT LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | 1 seconds |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
| Continuous shutter speed | 1.0 frames/s | 7.0 frames/s |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Set white balance | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | - | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) |
| Flash settings | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | - |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1280 x 720p (30fps), 640 x 480 (30fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC |
| Max video resolution | 1280x720 | 3840x2160 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, Motion JPEG | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | Built-in |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 160 grams (0.35 lb) | 231 grams (0.51 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 93 x 58 x 26mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.0") | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 250 shots | 280 shots |
| Battery format | Battery Pack | Built-in |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | EN-EL12 |
| Self timer | Yes | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card |
| Storage slots | Single | Single |
| Launch pricing | $229 | $387 |