Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202
94 Imaging
40 Features
37 Overall
38
94 Imaging
33 Features
17 Overall
26
Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-300mm (F3.1-6.5) lens
- 150g - 95 x 58 x 27mm
- Launched August 2012
(Full Review)
- 10MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 28-102mm (F2.8-5.7) lens
- 168g - 92 x 61 x 23mm
- Introduced February 2009
- Also Known as PL50
Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202 Overview
Its time to take a more detailed look at the Nikon S6400 and Samsung SL202, one being a Ultracompact and the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There exists a crucial gap between the image resolutions of the S6400 (16MP) and SL202 (10MP) but both cameras posses the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S6400 was launched 3 years later than the SL202 and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Each of the cameras feature different body design with the Nikon S6400 being a Ultracompact camera and the Samsung SL202 being a Compact camera.
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a brief overview of how the S6400 matches up against the SL202 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S6400 and Samsung SL202. The complete galleries are viewable at Nikon S6400 Gallery and Samsung SL202 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S6400 over the Samsung SL202
S6400 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | August 2012 | February 2009 | Fresher by 43 months | |
Screen size | 3" | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") | |
Screen resolution | 460k | 230k | Sharper screen (+230k dot) | |
Touch screen | Quickly navigate |
Reasons to pick Samsung SL202 over the Nikon S6400
SL202 | S6400 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon S6400 and Samsung SL202
S6400 | SL202 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Lack of manual focusing | |||
Screen type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed screen | |
Selfie screen | No selfie screen |
Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202 Physical Comparison
In case you're going to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S6400 comes with outer dimensions of 95mm x 58mm x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 150 grams (0.33 lbs) whilst the Samsung SL202 has dimensions of 92mm x 61mm x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") accompanied by a weight of 168 grams (0.37 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S6400 and Samsung SL202 in the new Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary dependant on the lens you have chosen during that time. The following is a front view size comparison of the S6400 versus the SL202.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the S6400 and SL202 is 94 and 94 respectively.
Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202 Sensor Comparison
More often than not, it's hard to see the contrast between sensor sizing only by checking specifications. The graphic here will help give you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the S6400 and SL202.
To sum up, both cameras come with the identical sensor size albeit not the same megapixels. You should expect the Nikon S6400 to give you greater detail utilizing its extra 6 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also allow you to crop pictures a good deal more aggressively. The more modern S6400 will have an edge with regard to sensor tech.
Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S6400 vs Samsung SL202 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S6400 | Samsung SL202 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Manufacturer | Nikon | Samsung |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S6400 | Samsung SL202 |
Also called as | - | PL50 |
Type | Ultracompact | Small Sensor Compact |
Launched | 2012-08-22 | 2009-02-17 |
Physical type | Ultracompact | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixels | 10 megapixels |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 and 16:9 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Peak resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Highest native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Minimum native ISO | 125 | 80 |
RAW photos | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
AF touch | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-300mm (12.0x) | 28-102mm (3.6x) |
Max aperture | f/3.1-6.5 | f/2.8-5.7 |
Macro focusing distance | 10cm | 5cm |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen sizing | 3 inch | 2.7 inch |
Resolution of screen | 460k dots | 230k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Screen tech | TFT LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | None |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 4s | 8s |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/1500s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | - | 4.60 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Auto & Red-Eye reduction, Slow Sync, Fill-in Flash, Flash Off, Red-Eye Fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 800 x 592 (20 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 640x480 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Eye-Fi Connected | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | None | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 150 grams (0.33 lb) | 168 grams (0.37 lb) |
Physical dimensions | 95 x 58 x 27mm (3.7" x 2.3" x 1.1") | 92 x 61 x 23mm (3.6" x 2.4" x 0.9") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 160 photos | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL19 | SLB-10A |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/MMC/SDHC card, Internal |
Card slots | One | One |
Launch pricing | $500 | $140 |