Clicky

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro

Portability
93
Imaging
41
Features
43
Overall
41
Nikon Coolpix S6900 front
 
Sigma DP2 Quattro front
Portability
70
Imaging
63
Features
38
Overall
53

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Key Specs

Nikon S6900
(Full Review)
  • 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fully Articulated Display
  • ISO 125 - 6400
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • 25-300mm (F3.3-6.3) lens
  • 181g - 99 x 58 x 28mm
  • Revealed February 2015
Sigma DP2 Quattro
(Full Review)
  • 20MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 6400
  • No Video
  • 45mm (F2.8) lens
  • 395g - 161 x 67 x 82mm
  • Launched February 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Overview

The following is a thorough review of the Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro, one is a Ultracompact and the other is a Large Sensor Compact by rivals Nikon and Sigma. The resolution of the S6900 (16MP) and the DP2 Quattro (20MP) is fairly close but the S6900 (1/2.3") and DP2 Quattro (APS-C) possess totally different sensor size.

Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

The S6900 was manufactured 13 months after the DP2 Quattro making the cameras a generation away from each other. The two cameras come with different body type with the Nikon S6900 being a Ultracompact camera and the Sigma DP2 Quattro being a Large Sensor Compact camera.

Before going in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a short introduction of how the S6900 grades against the DP2 Quattro when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.

Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon S6900 over the Sigma DP2 Quattro

 S6900 DP2 Quattro 
LaunchedFebruary 2015February 2014Newer by 13 months
Display typeFully ArticulatedFixed Fully Articulating display
Selfie screen Easy selfies

Reasons to pick Sigma DP2 Quattro over the Nikon S6900

 DP2 Quattro S6900 
Manual focus Very accurate focusing
Display resolution920k460kSharper display (+460k dot)

Common features in the Nikon S6900 and Sigma DP2 Quattro

 S6900 DP2 Quattro 
Display dimension3"3"Identical display size
Touch display Lack of Touch display

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Physical Comparison

When you are looking to travel with your camera frequently, you have to factor in its weight and proportions. The Nikon S6900 has got external measurements of 99mm x 58mm x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") having a weight of 181 grams (0.40 lbs) and the Sigma DP2 Quattro has measurements of 161mm x 67mm x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2") having a weight of 395 grams (0.87 lbs).

Check out the Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you have attached at the time. Underneath is the front view dimension comparison of the S6900 against the DP2 Quattro.

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro size comparison

Taking into account size and weight, the portability grade of the S6900 and DP2 Quattro is 93 and 70 respectively.

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro top view buttons comparison

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Sensor Comparison

Oftentimes, its hard to visualise the difference in sensor dimensions purely by looking through technical specs. The pic here might offer you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the S6900 and DP2 Quattro.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S6900 because of its smaller sensor will make shooting shallower DOF more difficult and the Sigma DP2 Quattro will render greater detail due to its extra 4MP. Greater resolution will also enable you to crop images much more aggressively. The more recent S6900 is going to have an advantage with regard to sensor tech.

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro sensor size comparison

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon S6900 Portrait photography advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Portrait photography advice
36
good MP (16 megapixels)
has face detect focus
focusing manually not possible
no manual control
no external flash support
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
77
you can focus manually
MP count good (20MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
includes face detect autofocus
supports RAW formats
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Street Comparison

Nikon S6900 Street photography information
Sigma DP2 Quattro Street photography information
62
fully articulated screen
image stabilization (Optical)
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
heavier than average (181 grams)
61
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Sports Comparison

Nikon S6900 Sports photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Sports photography info
41
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16MP)
has tracking focus
no shutter priority
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
has no phase detect auto focus
48
MP count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
can't change focal length (45mm)
max fps very slow (3.0 frames per second)
lack of image stabilization
does not have phase detect autofocus
Photography Glossary

Travel Comparison

Nikon S6900 Travel photography info
Sigma DP2 Quattro Travel photography info
67
good MP (16 megapixels)
built-in flash
selfie friendly display
relatively wide (25mm)
long zoom (300mm)
lack of Time Lapse function
terrible battery pack (180 shots)
heavier than average (181g)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
53
MP count good (20 megapixels)
display is not selfie friendly
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon S6900
Landscape photography with Sigma DP2 Quattro
42
relatively wide (25mm)
nice screen size (3 inches)
image stabilization (Optical)
good MP (16 megapixels)
focusing manually not possible
lens is fixed (fixed lens mount)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
no manual control
sensor is tiny (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
terrible battery pack (180 per charge)
lack of Time Lapse function
59
you can focus manually
screen is a good size (3 inches)
MP count good (20 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
supports RAW formats
can't change lens (fixed lens mount)
can't change focal length (45mm)
somewhat slow maximum aperture (f2.8)
lack of image stabilization
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Nikon S6900 Vlogging advice
Sigma DP2 Quattro Vlogging advice
70
relatively wide (25mm)
selfie friendly display
image stabilization (Optical)
has face detect focus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 pxls)
slow maximum aperture (f3.3)
lack of mic support
heavier than average (181 grams)
9
no video shooting
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Nikon S6900 vs Sigma DP2 Quattro Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon S6900 and Sigma DP2 Quattro
 Nikon Coolpix S6900Sigma DP2 Quattro
General Information
Brand Name Nikon Sigma
Model type Nikon Coolpix S6900 Sigma DP2 Quattro
Category Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Revealed 2015-02-10 2014-02-13
Physical type Ultracompact Large Sensor Compact
Sensor Information
Processor - TRUE III engine
Sensor type CMOS CMOS (Foveon X3)
Sensor size 1/2.3" APS-C
Sensor dimensions 6.17 x 4.55mm 23.5 x 15.7mm
Sensor area 28.1mm² 369.0mm²
Sensor resolution 16 megapixel 20 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9
Max resolution 4608 x 3456 5424 x 3616
Max native ISO 6400 6400
Lowest native ISO 125 100
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Autofocus center weighted
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detect focus
Contract detect focus
Phase detect focus
Total focus points - 9
Lens
Lens mount type fixed lens fixed lens
Lens zoom range 25-300mm (12.0x) 45mm (1x)
Maximum aperture f/3.3-6.3 f/2.8
Macro focusing range 2cm -
Focal length multiplier 5.8 1.5
Screen
Display type Fully Articulated Fixed Type
Display diagonal 3" 3"
Display resolution 460 thousand dots 920 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch capability
Display technology - TFT color LCD
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder None None
Features
Min shutter speed 4 seconds 30 seconds
Max shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shutter rate 9.0 frames/s 3.0 frames/s
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation - Yes
Custom white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 2.80 m (at Auto ISO) no built-in flash
Flash settings - no built-in flash
External flash
AEB
WB bracketing
Exposure
Multisegment
Average
Spot
Partial
AF area
Center weighted
Video features
Video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) -
Max video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic port
Headphone port
Connectivity
Wireless Built-In None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 181 gr (0.40 lbs) 395 gr (0.87 lbs)
Dimensions 99 x 58 x 28mm (3.9" x 2.3" x 1.1") 161 x 67 x 82mm (6.3" x 2.6" x 3.2")
DXO scores
DXO Overall rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery life 180 shots -
Battery type Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL19 BP-51
Self timer Yes (2 or 10 secs) Yes (2 or 10 secs)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage SD/SDHC/SDXC -
Card slots Single Single
Retail price $190 $931