Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520
93 Imaging
40 Features
40 Overall
40
68 Imaging
45 Features
45 Overall
45
Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 125 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-250mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 184g - 111 x 60 x 27mm
- Announced February 2013
(Full Review)
- 10MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 1600
- Sensor based Image Stabilization
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 552g - 136 x 92 x 68mm
- Revealed August 2008
- Superseded the Olympus E-510
Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 Overview
The following is a in depth comparison of the Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520, former is a Small Sensor Compact while the other is a Entry-Level DSLR by rivals Nikon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference between the image resolutions of the S800c (16MP) and E-520 (10MP) and the S800c (1/2.3") and E-520 (Four Thirds) posses totally different sensor measurements.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsThe S800c was revealed 4 years after the E-520 which is quite a sizable difference as far as tech is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Nikon S800c being a Compact camera and the Olympus E-520 being a Compact SLR camera.
Before we go into a more detailed comparison, here is a brief highlight of how the S800c scores against the E-520 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon Coolpix S800c & Olympus E-520. The full galleries are available at Nikon S800c Gallery & Olympus E-520 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S800c over the Olympus E-520
S800c | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2013 | August 2008 | Newer by 55 months | |
Display dimensions | 3.5" | 2.7" | Larger display (+0.8") | |
Display resolution | 819k | 230k | Sharper display (+589k dot) | |
Touch friendly display | Easily navigate |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-520 over the Nikon S800c
E-520 | S800c | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | More precise focus |
Common features in the Nikon S800c and Olympus E-520
S800c | E-520 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 Physical Comparison
If you're intending to travel with your camera regularly, you have to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon S800c enjoys outside dimensions of 111mm x 60mm x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") along with a weight of 184 grams (0.41 lbs) while the Olympus E-520 has specifications of 136mm x 92mm x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") along with a weight of 552 grams (1.22 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will change based on the lens you choose at that moment. Following is a front view size comparison of the S800c vs the E-520.
Looking at size and weight, the portability rating of the S800c and E-520 is 93 and 68 respectively.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is tough to visualise the gap between sensor dimensions merely by looking at a spec sheet. The image here should offer you a more clear sense of the sensor dimensions in the S800c and E-520.
As you can see, the 2 cameras have different resolutions and different sensor dimensions. The S800c with its tinier sensor will make shooting shallower DOF trickier and the Nikon S800c will give greater detail because of its extra 6MP. Greater resolution can also let you crop images a bit more aggressively. The more modern S800c will have an edge in sensor tech.
Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S800c vs Olympus E-520 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus E-520 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S800c | Olympus E-520 |
Category | Small Sensor Compact | Entry-Level DSLR |
Announced | 2013-02-04 | 2008-08-20 |
Body design | Compact | Compact SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor Chip | Expeed C2 | - |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 10MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 |
Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3648 x 2736 |
Maximum native ISO | 3200 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
Single AF | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 9 | 3 |
Lens | ||
Lens mounting type | fixed lens | Micro Four Thirds |
Lens focal range | 25-250mm (10.0x) | - |
Max aperture | f/3.2-5.8 | - |
Macro focus distance | 10cm | - |
Total lenses | - | 45 |
Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3.5 inch | 2.7 inch |
Screen resolution | 819k dot | 230k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch display | ||
Screen tech | OLED panel with Anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | - | 95 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | - | 0.46x |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 4s | 60s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/4000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 8.0fps | 4.0fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | - | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash range | - | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | - | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | - | 1/180s |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | - |
Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 3.0 (5 GBit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 184g (0.41 lbs) | 552g (1.22 lbs) |
Physical dimensions | 111 x 60 x 27mm (4.4" x 2.4" x 1.1") | 136 x 92 x 68mm (5.4" x 3.6" x 2.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | 55 |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | 21.4 |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | 10.4 |
DXO Low light score | not tested | 548 |
Other | ||
Battery life | 140 pictures | 650 pictures |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery model | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 seconds) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC | Compact Flash (Type I or II), xD Picture Card |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Price at launch | $290 | $400 |