Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1
91 Imaging
36 Features
41 Overall
38
91 Imaging
39 Features
22 Overall
32
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 160 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-450mm (F3.5-5.9) lens
- 214g - 105 x 62 x 35mm
- Released July 2011
- Later Model is Nikon S9300
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 1.5" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 800
- 1920 x 1080 video
- (1×)mm (F2.8) lens
- 190g - 66 x 43 x 89mm
- Introduced September 2014
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Overview
Its time to take a deeper look at the Nikon S9100 and Ricoh WG-M1, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Waterproof by brands Nikon and Ricoh. The image resolution of the S9100 (12MP) and the WG-M1 (14MP) is very well matched and both cameras offer the identical sensor sizing (1/2.3").
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S9100 was released 4 years earlier than the WG-M1 which is quite a large difference as far as technology is concerned. The two cameras feature the same body design (Compact).
Before delving straight to a detailed comparison, here is a short introduction of how the S9100 matches up versus the WG-M1 in regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery
Below is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9100 & Ricoh WG-M1. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9100 Gallery & Ricoh WG-M1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9100 over the Ricoh WG-M1
| S9100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very precise focusing | ||
| Display size | 3" |  | 1.5" | Larger display (+1.5") |
| Display resolution | 921k |  | 115k | Crisper display (+806k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh WG-M1 over the Nikon S9100
| WG-M1 | S9100 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | September 2014 |  | July 2011 | More modern by 38 months |
Common features in the Nikon S9100 and Ricoh WG-M1
| S9100 | WG-M1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Display type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed display |
| Selfie screen |  | Lack of selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly display |  | Lack of Touch friendly display |
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Physical Comparison
For those who are looking to carry around your camera frequently, you are going to need to think about its weight and dimensions. The Nikon S9100 provides exterior measurements of 105mm x 62mm x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") along with a weight of 214 grams (0.47 lbs) while the Ricoh WG-M1 has dimensions of 66mm x 43mm x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") having a weight of 190 grams (0.42 lbs).
Check out the Nikon S9100 and Ricoh WG-M1 in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Always remember, the weight of an ILC will vary depending on the lens you are utilizing at that time. Below is a front view physical size comparison of the S9100 compared to the WG-M1.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the S9100 and WG-M1 is 91 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is difficult to see the gap between sensor sizes just by looking at specs. The image here will give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S9100 and WG-M1.
All in all, each of these cameras come with the identical sensor size but not the same resolution. You can expect to see the Ricoh WG-M1 to give you greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution will let you crop photos a good deal more aggressively. The more aged S9100 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor technology.
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Nikon S9100 vs Ricoh WG-M1 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Ricoh WG-M1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Manufacturer | Nikon | Ricoh |
| Model | Nikon Coolpix S9100 | Ricoh WG-M1 |
| Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Waterproof |
| Released | 2011-07-19 | 2014-09-12 |
| Physical type | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | Expeed C2 | - |
| Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 12 megapixel | 14 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | - | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 4000 x 3000 | 4320 x 3240 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 800 |
| Min native ISO | 160 | 100 |
| RAW support | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focus | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 9 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | 25-450mm (18.0x) | (1×) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.5-5.9 | f/2.8 |
| Macro focus distance | 4cm | - |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 3 inch | 1.5 inch |
| Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dots | 115 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch capability | ||
| Screen technology | TFT-LCD with Anti-reflection coating | - |
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 4 seconds | - |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/2000 seconds | - |
| Continuous shutter rate | 10.0fps | 10.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash range | 4.00 m | no built-in flash |
| Flash options | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye | no built-in flash |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment exposure | ||
| Average exposure | ||
| Spot exposure | ||
| Partial exposure | ||
| AF area exposure | ||
| Center weighted exposure | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30fps), 1280 x 720p (30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps) | 1920 x 1080 (30p), 1280 x 960 (50p), 1280 x 720 (60p, 30p), 848 x 480 (60p, 120p) |
| Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | H.264 |
| Mic port | ||
| Headphone port | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Built-In |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 214g (0.47 lbs) | 190g (0.42 lbs) |
| Physical dimensions | 105 x 62 x 35mm (4.1" x 2.4" x 1.4") | 66 x 43 x 89mm (2.6" x 1.7" x 3.5") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 270 pictures | 350 pictures |
| Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | EN-EL12 | DB-65 |
| Self timer | Yes (10 or 2 sec) | - |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | microSD/microSDHC, internal |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Launch price | $329 | $2,000 |
