Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
90 Imaging
40 Features
48 Overall
43
77 Imaging
52 Features
31 Overall
43
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 232g - 110 x 64 x 35mm
- Released February 2014
- Superseded the Nikon S9500
- Replacement is Nikon S9900
(Full Review)
- 12MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 200 - 3200
- 1280 x 720 video
- 50mm (F2.5) lens
- 453g - 114 x 70 x 77mm
- Released November 2009
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Overview
Below, we are contrasting the Nikon S9700 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the other is a Advanced Mirrorless by companies Nikon and Ricoh. There is a considerable difference among the resolutions of the S9700 (16MP) and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (12MP) and the S9700 (1/2.3") and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro (APS-C) enjoy totally different sensor sizing.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoThe S9700 was brought out 4 years after the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro which is a fairly large difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon S9700 being a Compact camera and the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro being a Rangefinder-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving through a in-depth comparison, below is a simple summary of how the S9700 scores against the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon Coolpix S9700 & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro. The entire galleries are provided at Nikon S9700 Gallery & Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9700 over the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
S9700 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | February 2014 | November 2009 | Newer by 52 months | |
Display resolution | 921k | 920k | Sharper display (+1k dot) |
Reasons to pick Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro over the Nikon S9700
GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | S9700 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very exact focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9700 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro
S9700 | GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Display dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical display measurement | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Lacking Touch display |
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you'll have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon S9700 offers physical measurements of 110mm x 64mm x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") having a weight of 232 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro has sizing of 114mm x 70mm x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") with a weight of 453 grams (1.00 lbs).
Examine the Nikon S9700 and Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro in our newest Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you are using at that time. Below is the front view dimension comparison of the S9700 versus the GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability rating of the S9700 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro is 90 and 77 respectively.
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Sensor Comparison
Often, it's tough to visualise the gap in sensor dimensions merely by researching specifications. The image below may give you a greater sense of the sensor measurements in the S9700 and GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro.
To sum up, each of the cameras posses different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The S9700 due to its smaller sensor will make getting shallow DOF trickier and the Nikon S9700 will result in greater detail having its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will allow you to crop photos somewhat more aggressively. The younger S9700 will have an advantage in sensor innovation.
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9700 vs Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand | Nikon | Ricoh |
Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9700 | Ricoh GXR A12 50mm F2.5 Macro |
Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Advanced Mirrorless |
Released | 2014-02-07 | 2009-11-10 |
Body design | Compact | Rangefinder-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | - | GR engine III |
Sensor type | BSI-CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | APS-C |
Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 23.6 x 15.7mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 370.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | - | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4288 x 2848 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Min native ISO | 125 | 200 |
RAW data | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
Tracking AF | ||
AF selectice | ||
AF center weighted | ||
AF multi area | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detect focusing | ||
Contract detect focusing | ||
Phase detect focusing | ||
Total focus points | 99 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 50mm (1x) |
Maximal aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.5 |
Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 1.5 |
Screen | ||
Range of display | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Display diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of display | 921k dot | 920k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Display technology | TFT LCD with anti-reflection coating | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | None | Electronic (optional) |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 secs | 180 secs |
Highest shutter speed | 1/2000 secs | 1/3200 secs |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames/s | 3.0 frames/s |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Custom WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 6.00 m | 3.00 m |
Flash settings | TTL auto flash with monitor preflashes | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync, Manual |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30/25p, 60/50i) 1280 x 720 (60/50/30/25/15/12.5p) 960 x 540 (30/25p) 640 x 480 (120/30/25p) 320 x 240 (240p) | 1280 x 720 (24 fps), 640 x 480 (24 fps), 320 x 240 (24 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 232 grams (0.51 pounds) | 453 grams (1.00 pounds) |
Dimensions | 110 x 64 x 35mm (4.3" x 2.5" x 1.4") | 114 x 70 x 77mm (4.5" x 2.8" x 3.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 photographs | 320 photographs |
Battery format | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 10 sec, 10 sec (3 images) ) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC, Internal |
Storage slots | One | One |
Pricing at launch | $350 | $566 |