Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10
88 Imaging
40 Features
60 Overall
48
91 Imaging
36 Features
57 Overall
44
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Display
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Announced February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 26-130mm (F1.8-2.7) lens
- 221g - 102 x 61 x 34mm
- Introduced January 2013
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 Overview
On this page, we will be reviewing the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10, former is a Small Sensor Superzoom while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by competitors Nikon and Olympus. There is a noticeable difference among the image resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and XZ-10 (12MP) but both cameras posses the same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe S9900 was launched 2 years after the XZ-10 which is a fairly sizable difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before getting straight to a more detailed comparison, here is a simple summary of how the S9900 scores versus the XZ-10 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery photos for Nikon Coolpix S9900 & Olympus Stylus XZ-10. The complete galleries are available at Nikon S9900 Gallery & Olympus XZ-10 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Olympus XZ-10
| S9900 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | February 2015 | January 2013 | Newer by 25 months | |
| Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
| Screen resolution | 921k | 920k | Clearer screen (+1k dot) | |
| Selfie screen | Take selfies |
Reasons to pick Olympus XZ-10 over the Nikon S9900
| XZ-10 | S9900 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Very precise focusing | |||
| Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Olympus XZ-10
| S9900 | XZ-10 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen measurements |
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 Physical Comparison
When you are looking to travel with your camera regularly, you will need to factor its weight and size. The Nikon S9900 provides outside measurements of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") and a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) whilst the Olympus XZ-10 has specifications of 102mm x 61mm x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") with a weight of 221 grams (0.49 lbs).
Check the Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ dependant on the lens you are working with during that time. The following is a front view physical size comparison of the S9900 and the XZ-10.

Using size and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and XZ-10 is 88 and 91 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 Sensor Comparison
In many cases, it is very tough to imagine the gap in sensor dimensions purely by viewing specs. The pic underneath should give you a clearer sense of the sensor measurements in the S9900 and XZ-10.
As you can plainly see, both of these cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit different resolution. You can count on the Nikon S9900 to provide you with greater detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution will enable you to crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The newer S9900 should have a benefit when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Glossary Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneStreet Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banSports Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsTravel Comparison
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideLandscape Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music videoVlogging Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month
Nikon S9900 vs Olympus XZ-10 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Olympus Stylus XZ-10 |
| Category | Small Sensor Superzoom | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2015-02-10 | 2013-01-30 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CMOS | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 1:1, 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Highest Possible resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 6400 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| AF continuous | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| Multi area AF | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detect focusing | ||
| Contract detect focusing | ||
| Phase detect focusing | ||
| Total focus points | - | 35 |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount type | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 26-130mm (5.0x) |
| Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/1.8-2.7 |
| Macro focusing distance | 1cm | 1cm |
| Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Range of display | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
| Display size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of display | 921 thousand dot | 920 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch display | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Minimum shutter speed | 8s | 30s |
| Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter speed | 7.0 frames per second | 5.0 frames per second |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Expose Manually | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Set WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash distance | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | - |
| Flash settings | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Wireless |
| External flash | ||
| AEB | ||
| WB bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps, 18Mbps), 1280 x 720 (30 fps, 9Mbps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1920x1080 |
| Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | BuiltIn | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 289 gr (0.64 lb) | 221 gr (0.49 lb) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 102 x 61 x 34mm (4.0" x 2.4" x 1.3") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 300 shots | 240 shots |
| Battery form | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
| Battery ID | EN-EL19 | Li-50B |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
| Time lapse feature | ||
| Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SD/SDHC/SDXC |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Price at release | $300 | $428 |