Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320
88 Imaging
41 Features
60 Overall
48
98 Imaging
35 Features
36 Overall
35
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 25-750mm (F3.7-6.4) lens
- 289g - 112 x 66 x 40mm
- Revealed February 2015
- Superseded the Nikon S9700
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-5.8) lens
- n/ag - 97 x 61 x 21mm
- Revealed February 2009
- Alternate Name is WB1000
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 Overview
Here is a in depth analysis of the Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320, one being a Small Sensor Superzoom and the latter is a Ultracompact by companies Nikon and Samsung. There is a big difference among the resolutions of the S9900 (16MP) and TL320 (12MP) but they come with the exact same sensor measurements (1/2.3").
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe S9900 was launched 6 years later than the TL320 and that is a fairly big gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras come with different body type with the Nikon S9900 being a Compact camera and the Samsung TL320 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before we go straight into a in depth comparison, below is a concise overview of how the S9900 scores vs the TL320 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 Gallery
This is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix S9900 and Samsung TL320. The complete galleries are provided at Nikon S9900 Gallery and Samsung TL320 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon S9900 over the Samsung TL320
S9900 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Revealed | February 2015 | February 2009 | Fresher by 73 months | |
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating screen | |
Screen resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper screen (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung TL320 over the Nikon S9900
TL320 | S9900 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manual focus | Very accurate focusing |
Common features in the Nikon S9900 and Samsung TL320
S9900 | TL320 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Screen dimension | 3" | 3" | Identical screen measurements | |
Touch screen | Absent Touch screen |
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 Physical Comparison
If you're looking to carry your camera regularly, you should take into account its weight and proportions. The Nikon S9900 enjoys outer dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") having a weight of 289 grams (0.64 lbs) and the Samsung TL320 has measurements of 97mm x 61mm x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") with a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will vary depending on the lens you have during that time. Underneath is the front view overall size comparison of the S9900 and the TL320.
Factoring in size and weight, the portability score of the S9900 and TL320 is 88 and 98 respectively.
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 Sensor Comparison
Generally, its hard to envision the gap in sensor sizing merely by going through specifications. The photograph underneath may provide you a clearer sense of the sensor sizes in the S9900 and TL320.
To sum up, both of these cameras have got the exact same sensor measurements albeit not the same MP. You should expect the Nikon S9900 to show more detail utilizing its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also enable you to crop pictures much more aggressively. The newer S9900 will have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon S9900 vs Samsung TL320 Specifications
Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung TL320 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon Coolpix S9900 | Samsung TL320 |
Also called as | - | WB1000 |
Class | Small Sensor Superzoom | Ultracompact |
Revealed | 2015-02-10 | 2009-02-23 |
Body design | Compact | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.08 x 4.56mm |
Sensor surface area | 28.1mm² | 27.7mm² |
Sensor resolution | 16MP | 12MP |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 16:9, 4:3 and 3:2 |
Full resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 4000 x 3000 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 3200 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Autofocus continuous | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Tracking autofocus | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Autofocus center weighted | ||
Multi area autofocus | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | fixed lens | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | 25-750mm (30.0x) | 24-120mm (5.0x) |
Maximum aperture | f/3.7-6.4 | f/2.8-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | 1cm | 5cm |
Crop factor | 5.8 | 5.9 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 921 thousand dot | 460 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | None | None |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 8 seconds | 16 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
Continuous shooting speed | 7.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 6.00 m (at Auto ISO) | 5.00 m |
Flash settings | - | Auto, Auto & Red-eye reduction, Fill-in flash, Slow sync, Flash off, Red eye fix |
External flash | ||
Auto exposure bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Exposure | ||
Multisegment metering | ||
Average metering | ||
Spot metering | ||
Partial metering | ||
AF area metering | ||
Center weighted metering | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60i, 50i, 30p, 25p), 1280 x 720 (30p, 25p), 640 x 480 (30p, 25p) | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30, 15 fps) |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video file format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Built-In | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | BuiltIn | None |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 289 grams (0.64 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 112 x 66 x 40mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.6") | 97 x 61 x 21mm (3.8" x 2.4" x 0.8") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 300 images | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL19 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2 or 10 secs) | Yes (10 sec, 2 sec, Double, Motion Timer) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | SC/SDHC/MMC/MMCplus, internal |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Launch pricing | $300 | $380 |