Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000
91 Imaging
42 Features
44 Overall
42
95 Imaging
35 Features
17 Overall
27
Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 125 - 6400
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- 24-120mm (F2.8-4.9) lens
- 231g - 112 x 66 x 29mm
- Announced May 2017
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 2.7" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600
- 640 x 480 video
- 26-105mm (F2.6-5.9) lens
- 136g - 95 x 57 x 22mm
- Introduced July 2009
- Also Known as X-925
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Overview
Here is a in-depth overview of the Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000, former being a Waterproof while the latter is a Small Sensor Compact by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a large gap among the image resolutions of the W300 (16MP) and FE-4000 (12MP) but both cameras offer the same sensor size (1/2.3").
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created ImagesThe W300 was announced 7 years later than the FE-4000 and that is a fairly serious difference as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras have the same body design (Compact).
Before we go straight to a full comparison, here is a quick summary of how the W300 matches up against the FE-4000 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Gallery
Here is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon Coolpix W300 & Olympus FE-4000. The whole galleries are available at Nikon W300 Gallery & Olympus FE-4000 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon W300 over the Olympus FE-4000
| W300 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Introduced | May 2017 |  | July 2009 | Fresher by 96 months |
| Screen dimensions | 3" |  | 2.7" | Bigger screen (+0.3") |
| Screen resolution | 921k |  | 230k | Clearer screen (+691k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus FE-4000 over the Nikon W300
| FE-4000 | W300 |
|---|
Common features in the Nikon W300 and Olympus FE-4000
| W300 | FE-4000 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manual focus |  | Lack of manual focusing | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | Lacking selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | Neither features Touch friendly screen |
Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Physical Comparison
If you're aiming to carry your camera, you will need to factor in its weight and size. The Nikon W300 enjoys exterior dimensions of 112mm x 66mm x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") accompanied by a weight of 231 grams (0.51 lbs) while the Olympus FE-4000 has specifications of 95mm x 57mm x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") with a weight of 136 grams (0.30 lbs).
Check out the Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 in our brand new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will vary based on the lens you are working with at the time. Below is a front view dimensions comparison of the W300 and the FE-4000.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the W300 and FE-4000 is 91 and 95 respectively.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it is very hard to see the gap in sensor sizing merely by seeing a spec sheet. The graphic here should offer you a much better sense of the sensor sizes in the W300 and FE-4000.
Clearly, both of those cameras have the same sensor dimensions albeit not the same megapixels. You can expect the Nikon W300 to provide more detail with its extra 4 Megapixels. Higher resolution can also let you crop photographs a bit more aggressively. The younger W300 is going to have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Screen and ViewFinder
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photography GlossarySports Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesVlogging Comparison
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video
Nikon W300 vs Olympus FE-4000 Specifications
| Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus FE-4000 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Company | Nikon | Olympus |
| Model type | Nikon Coolpix W300 | Olympus FE-4000 |
| Other name | - | X-925 |
| Type | Waterproof | Small Sensor Compact |
| Announced | 2017-05-31 | 2009-07-22 |
| Body design | Compact | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Processor | - | TruePic III |
| Sensor type | - | CCD |
| Sensor size | 1/2.3" | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 6.17 x 4.55mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor area | 28.1mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 16 megapixel | 12 megapixel |
| Anti alias filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 |
| Maximum resolution | 4608 x 3456 | 3968 x 2976 |
| Maximum native ISO | 6400 | 1600 |
| Lowest native ISO | 125 | 100 |
| RAW images | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Manual focusing | ||
| Touch to focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| Selective AF | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| AF live view | ||
| Face detect AF | ||
| Contract detect AF | ||
| Phase detect AF | ||
| Lens | ||
| Lens support | fixed lens | fixed lens |
| Lens zoom range | 24-120mm (5.0x) | 26-105mm (4.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | f/2.8-4.9 | f/2.6-5.9 |
| Macro focusing range | 1cm | 3cm |
| Focal length multiplier | 5.8 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Display type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Display diagonal | 3" | 2.7" |
| Resolution of display | 921k dot | 230k dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch operation | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | None | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 1 seconds | 4 seconds |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/2000 seconds |
| Continuous shooting speed | 7.0 frames per sec | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual exposure | ||
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Integrated flash | ||
| Flash distance | 5.20 m (at Auto ISO) | 4.00 m |
| Flash modes | - | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Fill-in |
| External flash | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment | ||
| Average | ||
| Spot | ||
| Partial | ||
| AF area | ||
| Center weighted | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p, MP4, H.264, AAC | 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (30, 15 fps) |
| Maximum video resolution | 3840x2160 | 640x480 |
| Video format | MPEG-4, H.264 | Motion JPEG |
| Mic jack | ||
| Headphone jack | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | Built-In | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | Built-in | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proofing | ||
| Dust proofing | ||
| Shock proofing | ||
| Crush proofing | ||
| Freeze proofing | ||
| Weight | 231 gr (0.51 pounds) | 136 gr (0.30 pounds) |
| Physical dimensions | 112 x 66 x 29mm (4.4" x 2.6" x 1.1") | 95 x 57 x 22mm (3.7" x 2.2" x 0.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range rating | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light rating | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | 280 photographs | - |
| Battery form | Built-in | - |
| Battery ID | EN-EL12 | - |
| Self timer | Yes (2, 5 and 10 secs) | Yes (12 seconds) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Storage media | Onboard + SD/SDHC/SDXC card | xD Picture Card, microSD Card, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Retail pricing | $387 | $130 |
