Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W
55 Imaging
48 Features
45 Overall
46
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 10MP - APS-C Sensor
- 2.5" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 1600 (Bump to 3200)
- 1/8000s Maximum Shutter
- No Video
- Nikon F Mount
- 920g - 147 x 113 x 74mm
- Launched February 2006
- Superseded the Nikon D100
- Newer Model is Nikon D300
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Introduced June 2010
- Additionally referred to as WB650
Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Below, we are evaluating the Nikon D200 versus Samsung HZ35W, one is a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by brands Nikon and Samsung. The resolution of the D200 (10MP) and the HZ35W (12MP) is fairly comparable but the D200 (APS-C) and HZ35W (1/2.3") use different sensor sizes.
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthThe D200 was released 5 years prior to the HZ35W which is a fairly significant gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of the cameras come with different body type with the Nikon D200 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before getting through a comprehensive comparison, below is a concise summary of how the D200 matches up vs the HZ35W in terms of portability, imaging, features and an overall mark.
Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon D200 and Samsung HZ35W. The complete galleries are available at Nikon D200 Gallery and Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D200 over the Samsung HZ35W
D200 | HZ35W |
---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Nikon D200
HZ35W | D200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Introduced | June 2010 | February 2006 | Newer by 52 months | |
Display dimension | 3" | 2.5" | Larger display (+0.5") | |
Display resolution | 614k | 230k | Clearer display (+384k dot) |
Common features in the Nikon D200 and Samsung HZ35W
D200 | HZ35W | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
Touch friendly display | Absent Touch friendly display |
Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
In case you're going to travel with your camera frequently, you're going to have to think about its weight and volume. The Nikon D200 has exterior measurements of 147mm x 113mm x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") with a weight of 920 grams (2.03 lbs) while the Samsung HZ35W has sizing of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") and a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Take a look at the Nikon D200 versus Samsung HZ35W in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Do not forget, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you are employing during that time. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the D200 and the HZ35W.
Taking into consideration dimensions and weight, the portability score of the D200 and HZ35W is 55 and 91 respectively.
Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Quite often, its difficult to picture the difference in sensor dimensions only by checking out a spec sheet. The picture here should provide you a much better sense of the sensor measurements in the D200 and HZ35W.
Clearly, the 2 cameras have got different megapixels and different sensor dimensions. The D200 due to its larger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF easier and the Samsung HZ35W will produce greater detail as a result of its extra 2 Megapixels. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos much more aggressively. The more aged D200 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor innovation.
Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon D200 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
Nikon D200 | Samsung HZ35W | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon D200 | Samsung HZ35W |
Alternate name | - | WB650 |
Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
Launched | 2006-02-23 | 2010-06-16 |
Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
Sensor Information | ||
Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor measurements | 23.6 x 15.8mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
Sensor area | 372.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
Sensor resolution | 10 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
Highest resolution | 3872 x 2592 | 4000 x 3000 |
Highest native ISO | 1600 | 3200 |
Highest boosted ISO | 3200 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focus | ||
Touch to focus | ||
Continuous AF | ||
Single AF | ||
Tracking AF | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detection focusing | ||
Contract detection focusing | ||
Phase detection focusing | ||
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon F | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
Maximum aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
Available lenses | 309 | - |
Crop factor | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 2.5 inches | 3 inches |
Resolution of screen | 230 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch operation | ||
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentaprism) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.63x | - |
Features | ||
Slowest shutter speed | 30s | 16s |
Maximum shutter speed | 1/8000s | 1/2000s |
Continuous shooting speed | 5.0fps | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Integrated flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m | 5.00 m |
Flash modes | Front curtain, Rear curtain, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
External flash | ||
AEB | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Maximum flash sync | 1/250s | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
Highest video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
Microphone input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | None | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | BuiltIn |
Physical | ||
Environment seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 920 gr (2.03 lbs) | 245 gr (0.54 lbs) |
Dimensions | 147 x 113 x 74mm (5.8" x 4.4" x 2.9") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around score | 64 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 22.3 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 11.5 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 583 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery model | EN-EL3e | SLB-11A |
Self timer | Yes (2 to 20 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
Storage slots | Single | Single |
Launch pricing | $999 | $300 |