Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300
67 Imaging
64 Features
63 Overall
63
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
- Revealed July 2012
- Older Model is Nikon D3100
- Newer Model is Nikon D3300
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Released January 2005
- Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
- Replacement is Olympus E-330
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Overview
Lets examine more closely at the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-300, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the D3200 (24MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the D3200 (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor dimensions.
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneThe D3200 was manufactured 7 years after the E-300 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Nikon D3200 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.
Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the D3200 grades versus the E-300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Gallery
The following is a sample of the gallery pictures for Nikon D3200 & Olympus E-300. The entire galleries are available at Nikon D3200 Gallery & Olympus E-300 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Olympus E-300
D3200 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Released | July 2012 | January 2005 | More modern by 92 months | |
Display sizing | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
Display resolution | 921k | 134k | Clearer display (+787k dot) |
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Nikon D3200
E-300 | D3200 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-300
D3200 | E-300 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Manually focus | Dial accurate focusing | |||
Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
Selfie screen | Neither contains selfie screen | |||
Touch display | Neither contains Touch display |
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon D3200 has got external measurements of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs) while the Olympus E-300 has dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).
Analyze the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool.Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the D3200 compared to the E-300.
Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the D3200 and E-300 is 67 and 67 respectively.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison
Normally, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the D3200 and E-300.
To sum up, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The D3200 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Nikon D3200 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 16MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern D3200 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications
Nikon D3200 | Olympus E-300 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Make | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon D3200 | Olympus E-300 |
Also Known as | - | EVOLT E-300 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Advanced DSLR |
Revealed | 2012-07-25 | 2005-01-10 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | Mid-size SLR |
Sensor Information | ||
Processor | Expeed 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor dimensions | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 17.3 x 13mm |
Sensor surface area | 357.3mm² | 224.9mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixel | 8 megapixel |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Highest resolution | 6016 x 4000 | 3264 x 2448 |
Highest native ISO | 6400 | 400 |
Highest boosted ISO | 12800 | 1600 |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 100 |
RAW pictures | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Manual focusing | ||
Autofocus touch | ||
Continuous autofocus | ||
Single autofocus | ||
Autofocus tracking | ||
Selective autofocus | ||
Center weighted autofocus | ||
Autofocus multi area | ||
Autofocus live view | ||
Face detection focus | ||
Contract detection focus | ||
Phase detection focus | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 3 |
Cross type focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens support | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
Available lenses | 309 | 45 |
Crop factor | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
Screen diagonal | 3 inch | 1.8 inch |
Screen resolution | 921 thousand dots | 134 thousand dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch screen | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | Optical (pentamirror) |
Viewfinder coverage | 95% | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | - |
Features | ||
Lowest shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Highest shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Continuous shooting rate | 4.0 frames per sec | 3.0 frames per sec |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manual mode | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Change white balance | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash settings | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye |
Hot shoe | ||
AEB | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Highest flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | 1/180 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment exposure | ||
Average exposure | ||
Spot exposure | ||
Partial exposure | ||
AF area exposure | ||
Center weighted exposure | ||
Video features | ||
Supported video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | - |
Highest video resolution | 1920x1080 | None |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic support | ||
Headphone support | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environment sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 505 gr (1.11 lb) | 624 gr (1.38 lb) |
Dimensions | 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO All around rating | 81 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1131 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 images | - |
Form of battery | Battery Pack | - |
Battery ID | EN-EL14 | - |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 sec) |
Time lapse feature | ||
Storage type | SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant | Compact Flash (Type I or II) |
Card slots | Single | Single |
Cost at launch | $530 | $800 |