Clicky

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300

Portability
67
Imaging
64
Features
63
Overall
63
Nikon D3200 front
 
Olympus E-300 front
Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Key Specs

Nikon D3200
(Full Review)
  • 24MP - APS-C Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 6400 (Increase to 12800)
  • 1920 x 1080 video
  • Nikon F Mount
  • 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
  • Revealed July 2012
  • Older Model is Nikon D3100
  • Newer Model is Nikon D3300
Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Released January 2005
  • Additionally referred to as EVOLT E-300
  • Replacement is Olympus E-330
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Overview

Lets examine more closely at the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-300, former is a Entry-Level DSLR while the other is a Advanced DSLR by manufacturers Nikon and Olympus. There exists a sizable gap between the resolutions of the D3200 (24MP) and E-300 (8MP) and the D3200 (APS-C) and E-300 (Four Thirds) feature totally different sensor dimensions.

Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

The D3200 was manufactured 7 years after the E-300 which is quite a significant difference as far as technology is concerned. Each of these cameras offer different body type with the Nikon D3200 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera.

Before diving through a in depth comparison, below is a concise introduction of how the D3200 grades versus the E-300 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall score.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards
	
	

Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Olympus E-300

 D3200 E-300 
ReleasedJuly 2012January 2005More modern by 92 months
Display sizing3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution921k134kClearer display (+787k dot)

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Nikon D3200

 E-300 D3200 

Common features in the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-300

 D3200 E-300 
Manually focus Dial accurate focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither contains selfie screen
Touch display Neither contains Touch display

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Physical Comparison

In case you're planning to carry around your camera, you will need to consider its weight and dimensions. The Nikon D3200 has got external measurements of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") along with a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs) while the Olympus E-300 has dimensions of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") having a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs).

Analyze the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-300 in our completely new Camera & Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you are utilising at that time. Here is the front view overall size comparison of the D3200 compared to the E-300.

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 size comparison

Looking at dimensions and weight, the portability rating of the D3200 and E-300 is 67 and 67 respectively.

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 top view buttons comparison

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Sensor Comparison

Normally, it is difficult to envision the contrast between sensor sizes simply by reading through specifications. The pic underneath will help provide you a more clear sense of the sensor sizing in the D3200 and E-300.

To sum up, both of the cameras offer different megapixel count and different sensor sizes. The D3200 because of its larger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF simpler and the Nikon D3200 will resolve greater detail due to its extra 16MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop photos a little more aggressively. The more modern D3200 is going to have a benefit in sensor tech.

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 sensor size comparison

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and ViewFinder

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Nikon D3200 Portrait photography features
Olympus E-300 Portrait photography features
78
manual focus
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers face detect autofocus
saves RAW files
48
focusing manually
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
no liveview
low resolution sensor (8MP)
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Street Comparison

Street photography with Nikon D3200
Street photography with Olympus E-300
60
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
screen does not articulate
lack of image stabilization
51
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
fixed screen
lack of image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Nikon D3200 as a Sports photography camera
Olympus E-300 as a Sports photography camera
65
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
offers tracking focus
supports phase detect autofocus
max frames per second low (4.0 fps)
lack of image stabilization
37
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect auto focus
no liveview
max frames per second very slow (3.0 frames/s)
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8MP)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Travel Comparison

Nikon D3200 Travel photography factors
Olympus E-300 Travel photography factors
59
decent sensor resolution (24MP)
has built in flash
lack of Timelapse recording
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
45
flash built-in
missing Time Lapse function
low resolution sensor (8MP)
screen is not selfie friendly
Photography Glossary

Landscape Comparison

Landscape photography with Nikon D3200
Landscape photography with Olympus E-300
69
manual focus
swap lenses (Nikon F mount)
screen size is decent (3")
decent sensor resolution (24 megapixels)
decent sensor size (APS-C)
saves RAW files
lack of image stabilization
lack of Timelapse recording
43
focusing manually
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
nice sensor size (Four Thirds)
exports RAW formats
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
lack of image stabilization
low resolution sensor (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Time Lapse function
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Vlogging Comparison

Vlogging with Nikon D3200
Vlogging with Olympus E-300
27
offers face detect autofocus
video resolution high (1920 x 1080 resolution)
doesn't offer selfie friendly screen
lack of image stabilization
lack of microphone support
9
no video shooting
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-300 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-300
 Nikon D3200Olympus E-300
General Information
Make Nikon Olympus
Model type Nikon D3200 Olympus E-300
Also Known as - EVOLT E-300
Category Entry-Level DSLR Advanced DSLR
Revealed 2012-07-25 2005-01-10
Physical type Compact SLR Mid-size SLR
Sensor Information
Processor Expeed 3 -
Sensor type CMOS CCD
Sensor size APS-C Four Thirds
Sensor dimensions 23.2 x 15.4mm 17.3 x 13mm
Sensor surface area 357.3mm² 224.9mm²
Sensor resolution 24 megapixel 8 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 3:2 4:3
Highest resolution 6016 x 4000 3264 x 2448
Highest native ISO 6400 400
Highest boosted ISO 12800 1600
Lowest native ISO 100 100
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Manual focusing
Autofocus touch
Continuous autofocus
Single autofocus
Autofocus tracking
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Autofocus multi area
Autofocus live view
Face detection focus
Contract detection focus
Phase detection focus
Total focus points 11 3
Cross type focus points 1 -
Lens
Lens support Nikon F Micro Four Thirds
Available lenses 309 45
Crop factor 1.6 2.1
Screen
Type of screen Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen diagonal 3 inch 1.8 inch
Screen resolution 921 thousand dots 134 thousand dots
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch screen
Screen technology TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle -
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) Optical (pentamirror)
Viewfinder coverage 95% -
Viewfinder magnification 0.53x -
Features
Lowest shutter speed 30 seconds 60 seconds
Highest shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/4000 seconds
Continuous shooting rate 4.0 frames per sec 3.0 frames per sec
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual mode
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change white balance
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash distance 12.00 m (at ISO 100) -
Flash settings Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Highest flash synchronize 1/200 seconds 1/180 seconds
Exposure
Multisegment exposure
Average exposure
Spot exposure
Partial exposure
AF area exposure
Center weighted exposure
Video features
Supported video resolutions 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) -
Highest video resolution 1920x1080 None
Video data format MPEG-4, H.264 -
Mic support
Headphone support
Connectivity
Wireless Optional None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec)
GPS Optional None
Physical
Environment sealing
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 505 gr (1.11 lb) 624 gr (1.38 lb)
Dimensions 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating 81 not tested
DXO Color Depth rating 24.1 not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating 13.2 not tested
DXO Low light rating 1131 not tested
Other
Battery life 540 images -
Form of battery Battery Pack -
Battery ID EN-EL14 -
Self timer Yes Yes (2 or 12 sec)
Time lapse feature
Storage type SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant Compact Flash (Type I or II)
Card slots Single Single
Cost at launch $530 $800