Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III
67 Imaging
64 Features
63 Overall
63
80 Imaging
55 Features
75 Overall
63
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Expand to 12800)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 505g - 125 x 96 x 77mm
- Released July 2012
- Succeeded the Nikon D3100
- Renewed by Nikon D3300
(Full Review)
- 16MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 3" Tilting Screen
- ISO 200 - 25600
- Sensor based 5-axis Image Stabilization
- 3840 x 2160 video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 410g - 122 x 84 x 50mm
- Announced August 2017
- Older Model is Olympus E-M10 II
- Later Model is Olympus E-M10 IV
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Overview
On this page, we will be matching up the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-M10 III, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the latter is a Entry-Level Mirrorless by brands Nikon and Olympus. There exists a crucial gap between the resolutions of the D3200 (24MP) and E-M10 III (16MP) and the D3200 (APS-C) and E-M10 III (Four Thirds) have different sensor dimensions.
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesThe D3200 was brought out 6 years prior to the E-M10 III and that is quite a serious gap as far as technology is concerned. Both cameras have different body design with the Nikon D3200 being a Compact SLR camera and the Olympus E-M10 III being a SLR-style mirrorless camera.
Before diving into a in depth comparison, here is a concise highlight of how the D3200 scores against the E-M10 III with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Gallery
The following is a preview of the gallery images for Nikon D3200 and Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III. The entire galleries are available at Nikon D3200 Gallery and Olympus E-M10 III Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D3200 over the Olympus E-M10 III
D3200 | E-M10 III |
---|
Reasons to pick Olympus E-M10 III over the Nikon D3200
E-M10 III | D3200 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | August 2017 | July 2012 | Fresher by 62 months | |
Screen type | Tilting | Fixed | Tilting screen | |
Screen resolution | 1040k | 921k | Sharper screen (+119k dot) | |
Touch friendly screen | Quickly navigate |
Common features in the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-M10 III
D3200 | E-M10 III | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Focus manually | Very accurate focusing | |||
Screen dimensions | 3" | 3" | Equal screen sizing | |
Selfie screen | Lacking selfie screen |
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera frequently, you will want to consider its weight and volume. The Nikon D3200 features physical measurements of 125mm x 96mm x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") and a weight of 505 grams (1.11 lbs) and the Olympus E-M10 III has sizing of 122mm x 84mm x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") along with a weight of 410 grams (0.90 lbs).
Compare the Nikon D3200 and Olympus E-M10 III in the new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Always remember, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change based on the lens you use during that time. Following is a front view proportions comparison of the D3200 vs the E-M10 III.
Taking into account dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the D3200 and E-M10 III is 67 and 80 respectively.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Sensor Comparison
Quite often, it can be tough to picture the gap between sensor sizing purely by reviewing specs. The visual below should provide you a far better sense of the sensor sizing in the D3200 and E-M10 III.
As you can plainly see, both cameras have different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The D3200 due to its bigger sensor is going to make achieving shallower DOF simpler and the Nikon D3200 will offer greater detail having its extra 8 Megapixels. Higher resolution will also help you crop shots a bit more aggressively. The older D3200 is going to be disadvantaged in sensor innovation.
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon D3200 vs Olympus E-M10 III Specifications
Nikon D3200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Brand Name | Nikon | Olympus |
Model type | Nikon D3200 | Olympus OM-D E-M10 Mark III |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Entry-Level Mirrorless |
Released | 2012-07-25 | 2017-08-31 |
Physical type | Compact SLR | SLR-style mirrorless |
Sensor Information | ||
Chip | Expeed 3 | TruePic VIII |
Sensor type | CMOS | CMOS |
Sensor size | APS-C | Four Thirds |
Sensor measurements | 23.2 x 15.4mm | 17.4 x 13mm |
Sensor area | 357.3mm² | 226.2mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24MP | 16MP |
Anti alias filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | 4:3 |
Max resolution | 6016 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | 25600 |
Max enhanced ISO | 12800 | - |
Lowest native ISO | 100 | 200 |
RAW photos | ||
Lowest enhanced ISO | - | 100 |
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
AF touch | ||
Continuous AF | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
Selective AF | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
AF multi area | ||
AF live view | ||
Face detect AF | ||
Contract detect AF | ||
Phase detect AF | ||
Total focus points | 11 | 121 |
Cross type focus points | 1 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount type | Nikon F | Micro Four Thirds |
Amount of lenses | 309 | 107 |
Focal length multiplier | 1.6 | 2.1 |
Screen | ||
Display type | Fixed Type | Tilting |
Display diagonal | 3" | 3" |
Display resolution | 921k dots | 1,040k dots |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch friendly | ||
Display tech | TFT LCD with 160� viewing angle | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder | Optical (pentamirror) | Electronic |
Viewfinder resolution | - | 2,360k dots |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | 100 percent |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.53x | 0.62x |
Features | ||
Min shutter speed | 30 seconds | 60 seconds |
Max shutter speed | 1/4000 seconds | 1/4000 seconds |
Max quiet shutter speed | - | 1/16000 seconds |
Continuous shutter rate | 4.0fps | 8.6fps |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Expose Manually | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Built-in flash | ||
Flash distance | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | 5.80 m (at ISO 100) |
Flash options | Auto, Red-Eye, Slow, Red-Eye Slow, Rear curtain | Auto, redeye, slow sync, 2nd-curtain slow sync, redeye slow sync, fill-in, manual, off |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
White balance bracketing | ||
Max flash synchronize | 1/200 seconds | 1/250 seconds |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (30,25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | 3840 x 2160 @ 30p / 102 Mbps, MOV, H.264, Linear PCM |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 3840x2160 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | MPEG-4, H.264 |
Microphone port | ||
Headphone port | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | Built-In |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental sealing | ||
Water proofing | ||
Dust proofing | ||
Shock proofing | ||
Crush proofing | ||
Freeze proofing | ||
Weight | 505g (1.11 pounds) | 410g (0.90 pounds) |
Physical dimensions | 125 x 96 x 77mm (4.9" x 3.8" x 3.0") | 122 x 84 x 50mm (4.8" x 3.3" x 2.0") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall rating | 81 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth rating | 24.1 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range rating | 13.2 | not tested |
DXO Low light rating | 1131 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 540 shots | 330 shots |
Battery type | Battery Pack | Battery Pack |
Battery ID | EN-EL14 | BLS-50 |
Self timer | Yes | Yes (2 or 12 secs, custom) |
Time lapse recording | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC UHS-I compliant | SD/SDHC/SDXC (UHS-I/II supported) |
Card slots | One | One |
Retail pricing | $530 | $650 |