Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65
66 Imaging
65 Features
77 Overall
69
99 Imaging
37 Features
19 Overall
29
Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 24MP - APS-C Sensor
- 3" Fully Articulated Screen
- ISO 100 - 6400 (Push to 25600)
- 1920 x 1080 video
- Nikon F Mount
- 555g - 129 x 98 x 78mm
- Introduced May 2013
- Previous Model is Nikon D5100
- Replacement is Nikon D5300
(Full Review)
- 14MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 0 - 0
- 1280 x 720 video
- ()mm (F) lens
- n/ag - 92 x 53 x 17mm
- Announced January 2011
Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 Overview
In this article, we are matching up the Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65, one being a Entry-Level DSLR and the other is a Ultracompact by rivals Nikon and Samsung. There is a significant difference among the image resolutions of the D5200 (24MP) and ST65 (14MP) and the D5200 (APS-C) and ST65 (1/2.3") possess different sensor size.
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingThe D5200 was revealed 2 years later than the ST65 and that is a fairly sizable gap as far as camera tech is concerned. The two cameras offer different body type with the Nikon D5200 being a Compact SLR camera and the Samsung ST65 being a Ultracompact camera.
Before delving through a thorough comparison, below is a quick summation of how the D5200 matches up vs the ST65 with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 Gallery
This is a sample of the gallery pics for Nikon D5200 and Samsung ST65. The full galleries are viewable at Nikon D5200 Gallery and Samsung ST65 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Nikon D5200 over the Samsung ST65
D5200 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Announced | May 2013 | January 2011 | Fresher by 29 months | |
Focus manually | Dial accurate focus | |||
Display type | Fully Articulated | Fixed | Fully Articulating display | |
Display resolution | 921k | 460k | Sharper display (+461k dot) | |
Selfie screen | Easy selfies |
Reasons to pick Samsung ST65 over the Nikon D5200
ST65 | D5200 |
---|
Common features in the Nikon D5200 and Samsung ST65
D5200 | ST65 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Display sizing | 3" | 3" | Equivalent display size | |
Touch display | Neither offers Touch display |
Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 Physical Comparison
In case you're planning to carry your camera frequently, you'll have to take into account its weight and measurements. The Nikon D5200 offers outer dimensions of 129mm x 98mm x 78mm (5.1" x 3.9" x 3.1") accompanied by a weight of 555 grams (1.22 lbs) and the Samsung ST65 has proportions of 92mm x 53mm x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") having a weight of n/a grams (0.00 lbs).
Contrast the Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 in the all new Camera with Lens Size Comparison Tool.Remember that, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you choose at that time. Underneath is the front view over all size comparison of the D5200 vs the ST65.
Taking into account size and weight, the portability score of the D5200 and ST65 is 66 and 99 respectively.
Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 Sensor Comparison
Usually, it's difficult to imagine the difference in sensor sizing merely by viewing technical specs. The photograph below should provide you a stronger sense of the sensor sizes in the D5200 and ST65.
As you have seen, both of those cameras enjoy different resolutions and different sensor sizing. The D5200 having a larger sensor is going to make getting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Nikon D5200 will provide you with more detail because of its extra 10MP. Greater resolution will let you crop photos far more aggressively. The newer D5200 should have an edge when it comes to sensor technology.
Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 Screen and ViewFinder
Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Street Comparison
Sports Comparison
Travel Comparison
Landscape Comparison
Vlogging Comparison
Nikon D5200 vs Samsung ST65 Specifications
Nikon D5200 | Samsung ST65 | |
---|---|---|
General Information | ||
Company | Nikon | Samsung |
Model | Nikon D5200 | Samsung ST65 |
Category | Entry-Level DSLR | Ultracompact |
Introduced | 2013-05-16 | 2011-01-19 |
Body design | Compact SLR | Ultracompact |
Sensor Information | ||
Powered by | Expeed 3 | - |
Sensor type | CMOS | CCD |
Sensor size | APS-C | 1/2.3" |
Sensor dimensions | 23.5 x 15.6mm | 6.16 x 4.62mm |
Sensor surface area | 366.6mm² | 28.5mm² |
Sensor resolution | 24 megapixels | 14 megapixels |
Anti aliasing filter | ||
Aspect ratio | 3:2 | - |
Max resolution | 6000 x 4000 | 4608 x 3456 |
Max native ISO | 6400 | - |
Max enhanced ISO | 25600 | - |
Min native ISO | 100 | - |
RAW files | ||
Autofocusing | ||
Focus manually | ||
Touch to focus | ||
AF continuous | ||
AF single | ||
AF tracking | ||
AF selectice | ||
Center weighted AF | ||
Multi area AF | ||
Live view AF | ||
Face detection AF | ||
Contract detection AF | ||
Phase detection AF | ||
Number of focus points | 39 | - |
Cross focus points | 9 | - |
Lens | ||
Lens mount | Nikon F | fixed lens |
Lens focal range | - | () |
Number of lenses | 309 | - |
Focal length multiplier | 1.5 | 5.8 |
Screen | ||
Screen type | Fully Articulated | Fixed Type |
Screen size | 3 inches | 3 inches |
Screen resolution | 921k dot | 460k dot |
Selfie friendly | ||
Liveview | ||
Touch function | ||
Screen technology | TFT LCD monitor | - |
Viewfinder Information | ||
Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
Viewfinder coverage | 95 percent | - |
Viewfinder magnification | 0.52x | - |
Features | ||
Minimum shutter speed | 30 secs | 8 secs |
Fastest shutter speed | 1/4000 secs | 1/2000 secs |
Continuous shutter speed | 5.0 frames per sec | - |
Shutter priority | ||
Aperture priority | ||
Manually set exposure | ||
Exposure compensation | Yes | - |
Set WB | ||
Image stabilization | ||
Inbuilt flash | ||
Flash range | 12.00 m (at ISO 100) | - |
Flash modes | Auto, On, Off, Red-eye, Slow sync, Rear curtain | - |
External flash | ||
AE bracketing | ||
WB bracketing | ||
Fastest flash sync | 1/200 secs | - |
Exposure | ||
Multisegment | ||
Average | ||
Spot | ||
Partial | ||
AF area | ||
Center weighted | ||
Video features | ||
Video resolutions | 1920 x 1080 (60, 50, 30, 25, 24 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 50 fps), 640 x 424 (30, 25 fps) | 1280 x 720 |
Max video resolution | 1920x1080 | 1280x720 |
Video data format | MPEG-4, H.264 | - |
Mic input | ||
Headphone input | ||
Connectivity | ||
Wireless | Optional | None |
Bluetooth | ||
NFC | ||
HDMI | ||
USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | none |
GPS | Optional | None |
Physical | ||
Environmental seal | ||
Water proof | ||
Dust proof | ||
Shock proof | ||
Crush proof | ||
Freeze proof | ||
Weight | 555g (1.22 lb) | - |
Dimensions | 129 x 98 x 78mm (5.1" x 3.9" x 3.1") | 92 x 53 x 17mm (3.6" x 2.1" x 0.7") |
DXO scores | ||
DXO Overall score | 84 | not tested |
DXO Color Depth score | 24.2 | not tested |
DXO Dynamic range score | 13.9 | not tested |
DXO Low light score | 1284 | not tested |
Other | ||
Battery life | 500 photographs | - |
Battery format | Battery Pack | - |
Battery model | EN-EL14 | - |
Self timer | Yes (2, 5, 10 or 20 sec) | - |
Time lapse shooting | ||
Type of storage | SD/SDHC/SDXC | - |
Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
Cost at release | $595 | $130 |