Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1
59 Imaging
38 Features
36 Overall
37
66 Imaging
41 Features
37 Overall
39
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1 Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 5MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 735g - 141 x 104 x 81mm
- Introduced November 2003
- Replacement is Olympus E-3
(Full Review)
- 16MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 3200
- Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
- 1920 x 1080 video
- 24-1248mm (F2.8-5.6) lens
- 567g - 119 x 89 x 98mm
- Revealed July 2014
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1 Overview
Its time to examine more in depth at the Olympus E-1 versus Pentax XG-1, former being a Pro DSLR while the latter is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Pentax. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-1 (5MP) and XG-1 (16MP) and the E-1 (Four Thirds) and XG-1 (1/2.3") use totally different sensor measurements.
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixelsThe E-1 was revealed 11 years prior to the XG-1 and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-1 being a Large SLR camera and the Pentax XG-1 being a SLR-like (bridge) camera.
Before delving through a comprehensive comparison, below is a quick highlight of how the E-1 matches up vs the XG-1 when it comes to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1 Gallery
Following is a preview of the gallery images for Olympus E-1 & Pentax XG-1. The full galleries are viewable at Olympus E-1 Gallery & Pentax XG-1 Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-1 over the Pentax XG-1
| E-1 | XG-1 |
|---|
Reasons to pick Pentax XG-1 over the Olympus E-1
| XG-1 | E-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | July 2014 |  | November 2003 | Fresher by 129 months |
| Screen dimension | 3" |  | 1.8" | Bigger screen (+1.2") |
| Screen resolution | 460k |  | 134k | Crisper screen (+326k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-1 and Pentax XG-1
| E-1 | XG-1 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus |  | Very accurate focus | ||
| Screen type | Fixed |  | Fixed | Fixed screen |
| Selfie screen |  | No selfie screen | ||
| Touch friendly screen |  | No Touch friendly screen |
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1 Physical Comparison
If you are aiming to carry your camera, you'll need to factor in its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-1 offers outside dimensions of 141mm x 104mm x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") along with a weight of 735 grams (1.62 lbs) while the Pentax XG-1 has dimensions of 119mm x 89mm x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") and a weight of 567 grams (1.25 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-1 versus Pentax XG-1 in our brand new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Don't forget, the weight of an ILC will differ depending on the lens you use at that moment. The following is the front view measurements comparison of the E-1 and the XG-1.
Using size and weight, the portability score of the E-1 and XG-1 is 59 and 66 respectively.
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1 Sensor Comparison
Oftentimes, it's tough to see the contrast in sensor sizing simply by looking through a spec sheet. The visual here should offer you a clearer sense of the sensor dimensions in the E-1 and XG-1.
Clearly, the two cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-1 having a bigger sensor will make shooting shallower DOF easier and the Pentax XG-1 will provide you with extra detail because of its extra 11MP. Higher resolution will also enable you to crop photographs somewhat more aggressively. The older E-1 will be disadvantaged when it comes to sensor technology.
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1 Screen and ViewFinder
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next monthStreet Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsSports Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsTravel Comparison
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealingLandscape Comparison
Photography GlossaryVlogging Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone
Olympus E-1 vs Pentax XG-1 Specifications
| Olympus E-1 | Pentax XG-1 | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Brand | Olympus | Pentax |
| Model | Olympus E-1 | Pentax XG-1 |
| Category | Pro DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Introduced | 2003-11-29 | 2014-07-15 |
| Physical type | Large SLR | SLR-like (bridge) |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | BSI-CMOS |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor measurements | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 5 megapixel | 16 megapixel |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3, 3:2 and 16:9 |
| Peak resolution | 2560 x 1920 | 4608 x 3456 |
| Highest native ISO | 3200 | 3200 |
| Min native ISO | 100 | 100 |
| RAW format | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| Touch focus | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| AF single | ||
| Tracking AF | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection focusing | ||
| Contract detection focusing | ||
| Phase detection focusing | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mount | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-1248mm (52.0x) |
| Maximal aperture | - | f/2.8-5.6 |
| Macro focus range | - | 1cm |
| Number of lenses | 45 | - |
| Crop factor | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Type of screen | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen diagonal | 1.8" | 3" |
| Screen resolution | 134 thousand dots | 460 thousand dots |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch function | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder | Optical (pentaprism) | Electronic |
| Viewfinder resolution | - | 200 thousand dots |
| Viewfinder coverage | 100% | - |
| Viewfinder magnification | 0.48x | - |
| Features | ||
| Min shutter speed | 60s | 4s |
| Max shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shutter rate | 3.0fps | 9.0fps |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manual mode | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Custom WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | no built-in flash | 6.00 m |
| Flash settings | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Force Off, Flash Auto, Force Flash, Slow Sync., Slow Sync. + Red-Eye, Red-Eye Reduction |
| Hot shoe | ||
| Auto exposure bracketing | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Max flash synchronize | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Supported video resolutions | - | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps), 1280 x 720 (60, 30 fps), 640 x 480 (30 fps), 640 x 480 (120 fps) |
| Highest video resolution | None | 1920x1080 |
| Video format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Microphone support | ||
| Headphone support | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | Eye-Fi Connected |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | None |
| Physical | ||
| Environment sealing | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 735 gr (1.62 lb) | 567 gr (1.25 lb) |
| Dimensions | 141 x 104 x 81mm (5.6" x 4.1" x 3.2") | 119 x 89 x 98mm (4.7" x 3.5" x 3.9") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO Overall score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery life | - | 240 pictures |
| Battery style | - | Battery Pack |
| Battery model | - | LB-060 |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec) |
| Time lapse shooting | ||
| Storage type | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC |
| Card slots | One | One |
| Cost at release | $1,700 | $599 |
