Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Ricoh CX2 front
Portability
93
Imaging
32
Features
35
Overall
33

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Display
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Increase to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Announced January 2005
  • Also Known as EVOLT E-300
  • New Model is Olympus E-330
Ricoh CX2
(Full Review)
  • 9MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 1600
  • Sensor-shift Image Stabilization
  • 640 x 480 video
  • 28-300mm (F3.5-5.6) lens
  • 185g - 102 x 58 x 29mm
  • Launched August 2009
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 Overview

Below is a extensive review of the Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2, one being a Advanced DSLR and the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by rivals Olympus and Ricoh. The resolution of the E-300 (8MP) and the CX2 (9MP) is very close but the E-300 (Four Thirds) and CX2 (1/2.3") come with different sensor sizing.

Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

The E-300 was announced 5 years prior to the CX2 and that is a fairly serious gap as far as camera technology is concerned. Each of these cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Ricoh CX2 being a Compact camera.

Before going through a thorough comparison, below is a brief synopsis of how the E-300 scores against the CX2 with respect to portability, imaging, features and an overall grade.

Photography Glossary
	
	

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Ricoh CX2

 E-300 CX2 

Reasons to pick Ricoh CX2 over the Olympus E-300

 CX2 E-300 
LaunchedAugust 2009January 2005More recent by 56 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution920k134kCrisper display (+786k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Ricoh CX2

 E-300 CX2 
Manual focus More accurate focus
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Neither provides selfie screen
Touch display Neither provides Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 Physical Comparison

If you are planning to lug around your camera regularly, you will have to consider its weight and proportions. The Olympus E-300 provides exterior measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") accompanied by a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) while the Ricoh CX2 has measurements of 102mm x 58mm x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1") along with a weight of 185 grams (0.41 lbs).

Take a look at the Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 in the latest Camera and Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into consideration, the weight of an Interchangeable Lens Camera will change dependant on the lens you are utilizing during that time. Underneath is the front view physical size comparison of the E-300 and the CX2.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 size comparison

Using dimensions and weight, the portability grade of the E-300 and CX2 is 67 and 93 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 Sensor Comparison

Sometimes, it is very difficult to picture the gap in sensor measurements just by viewing specifications. The photograph here will help provide you a far better sense of the sensor measurements in the E-300 and CX2.

Plainly, both of these cameras have got different resolutions and different sensor measurements. The E-300 with its larger sensor is going to make shooting shallower depth of field less difficult and the Ricoh CX2 will render greater detail with its extra 1MP. Greater resolution can also help you crop pics much more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged with regard to sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Portrait photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Portrait photography camera
48
focusing manually
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
no liveview
MP count low (8MP)
25
focusing manually
no manual control
can't use external flash
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Street photography with Olympus E-300
Street photography with Ricoh CX2
51
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
screen is fixed
does not have image stabilization
max ISO too low (400)
61
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (185 grams)
no moving screen
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Body cameras now worn by bakery staff to deter stealing

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography details
Ricoh CX2 Sports photography details
37
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
comes with phase detect AF
no liveview
slow fps (3.0 fps)
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8 megapixels)
26
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lack of shutter priority mode
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have phase detect AF
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 as a Travel photography camera
Ricoh CX2 as a Travel photography camera
45
has built in flash
no Timelapse recording
MP count low (8 megapixels)
does not have selfie friendly screen
66
lighter than others (185g)
flash built-in
fairly wide (28mm)
long reach (300mm)
low MP (9MP)
display is not selfie friendly
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Ricoh CX2 Landscape photography details
43
focusing manually
swap lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is good (Four Thirds)
delivers RAW files
small screen (1.8 inch)
no liveview
does not have image stabilization
MP count low (8MP)
max ISO too low (400)
no Timelapse recording
42
focusing manually
fairly wide (28mm)
pretty good screen size (3 inch)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
fixed lens (fixed lens mount)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
no manual control
low MP (9MP)
sensor size is very small (1/2.3")
does not have RAW files
Cutting-edge AI developed by Apple deciphers subtle nuances in pixels

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging factors
Ricoh CX2 Vlogging factors
9
no video
30
fairly wide (28mm)
image stabilization (Sensor-shift)
lighter than others (185g)
sluggish max aperture (f3.5)
display is not selfie friendly
video resolution low (640 x 480 resolution)
missing external mic port
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Olympus E-300 vs Ricoh CX2 Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Ricoh CX2
 Olympus E-300Ricoh CX2
General Information
Company Olympus Ricoh
Model type Olympus E-300 Ricoh CX2
Also Known as EVOLT E-300 -
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Announced 2005-01-10 2009-08-20
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Chip - Smooth Imaging Engine IV
Sensor type CCD CMOS
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixel 9 megapixel
Anti alias filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 1:1, 4:3 and 3:2
Maximum resolution 3264 x 2448 3456 x 2592
Maximum native ISO 400 1600
Maximum boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW support
Autofocusing
Focus manually
Autofocus touch
Autofocus continuous
Single autofocus
Tracking autofocus
Selective autofocus
Center weighted autofocus
Multi area autofocus
Autofocus live view
Face detect autofocus
Contract detect autofocus
Phase detect autofocus
Total focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens support Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens zoom range - 28-300mm (10.7x)
Maximum aperture - f/3.5-5.6
Macro focusing range - 1cm
Amount of lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Range of display Fixed Type Fixed Type
Display diagonal 1.8 inches 3 inches
Display resolution 134k dot 920k dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Slowest shutter speed 60 seconds 8 seconds
Maximum shutter speed 1/4000 seconds 1/2000 seconds
Continuous shooting speed 3.0fps -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manual exposure
Exposure compensation Yes -
Set white balance
Image stabilization
Integrated flash
Flash distance - 3.00 m (ISO 400)
Flash settings Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
WB bracketing
Maximum flash sync 1/180 seconds -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 640 x 480 (30 fps), 320 x 240 (30 fps)
Maximum video resolution None 640x480
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic jack
Headphone jack
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None None
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proofing
Dust proofing
Shock proofing
Crush proofing
Freeze proofing
Weight 624g (1.38 lb) 185g (0.41 lb)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 102 x 58 x 29mm (4.0" x 2.3" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around rating not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth rating not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range rating not tested not tested
DXO Low light rating not tested not tested
Other
Battery ID - DB-70
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2, 10 or Custom)
Time lapse feature
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC card, Internal
Storage slots Single Single
Retail price $800 $341