Clicky

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W

Portability
67
Imaging
41
Features
31
Overall
37
Olympus E-300 front
 
Samsung HZ35W front
Portability
91
Imaging
35
Features
42
Overall
37

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs

Olympus E-300
(Full Review)
  • 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
  • 1.8" Fixed Screen
  • ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
  • No Video
  • Micro Four Thirds Mount
  • 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
  • Launched January 2005
  • Other Name is EVOLT E-300
  • Newer Model is Olympus E-330
Samsung HZ35W
(Full Review)
  • 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
  • 3" Fixed Display
  • ISO 80 - 3200
  • Optical Image Stabilization
  • 1280 x 720 video
  • 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
  • 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
  • Revealed June 2010
  • Alternate Name is WB650
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview

Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.

Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a Landslide

The E-300 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the HZ35W and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.

Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-300 matches up versus the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.

Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video

        

Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung HZ35W

 E-300 HZ35W 

Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-300

 HZ35W E-300 
RevealedJune 2010January 2005Fresher by 66 months
Display dimension3"1.8"Larger display (+1.2")
Display resolution614k134kCrisper display (+480k dot)

Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ35W

 E-300 HZ35W 
Manually focus Dial precise focusing
Display typeFixed Fixed Fixed display
Selfie screen Absent selfie screen
Touch display Absent Touch display

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison

If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).

Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool. Camera Size Comparison with Lenses

Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the HZ35W.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W size comparison

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and HZ35W is 67 and 91 respectively.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W top view buttons comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison

Often, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and HZ35W.

As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Samsung HZ35W will produce greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W sensor size comparison

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and Viewfinder comparison
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images

Photography Type Scores

Portrait Comparison

Olympus E-300 Portrait photography factors
Samsung HZ35W Portrait photography factors
48
manual focus
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
does not have liveview
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
34
manual focus
includes face detect focus
cannot use external flash
low MP (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firms

Street Comparison

Olympus E-300 Street photography advice
Samsung HZ35W Street photography advice
51
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen does not articulate
does not have image stabilization
low maximum ISO (400)
60
built in image stabilization (Optical)
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
screen does not articulate
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modes

Sports Comparison

Olympus E-300 Sports photography highlights
Samsung HZ35W Sports photography highlights
37
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
sensor has phase detect autofocus
does not have liveview
slow continuous shooting (3.0 frames per second)
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
42
incredible zoom range (24-360mm 15.0 x zoom)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes tracking focus
low MP (12 megapixels)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no phase detect auto focus
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or ban

Travel Comparison

Olympus E-300 Travel photography information
Samsung HZ35W Travel photography information
45
flash built-in
missing Timelapse mode
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
doesn't have selfie friendly screen
63
lighter than competition in class (245 grams)
flash built-in
rather wide (24mm)
great zoom (360mm)
doesn't have Time Lapse function
low MP (12MP)
screen isn't selfie friendly
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD Cards

Landscape Comparison

Olympus E-300 Landscape photography details
Samsung HZ35W Landscape photography details
43
manual focus
change lenses (Micro Four Thirds mount)
sensor size is nice (Four Thirds)
saves RAW formats
screen is small (1.8 inches)
does not have liveview
does not have image stabilization
sensor resolution low (8 megapixels)
low maximum ISO (400)
missing Timelapse mode
43
manual focus
rather wide (24mm)
nice screen size (3")
built in image stabilization (Optical)
cannot swap lenses (fixed lens mount)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
low MP (12MP)
small sensor size (1/2.3")
has no RAW support
doesn't have Time Lapse function
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhone

Vlogging Comparison

Olympus E-300 Vlogging highlights
Samsung HZ35W Vlogging highlights
9
no video recording
31
rather wide (24mm)
built in image stabilization (Optical)
includes face detect focus
lighter than competition in class (245g)
somewhat slow max aperture (f3.2)
screen isn't selfie friendly
video quality not great (1280 x 720 pixels)
doesn't have mic jack
Photography Glossary

Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications

Detailed spec comparison table for Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ35W
 Olympus E-300Samsung HZ35W
General Information
Make Olympus Samsung
Model Olympus E-300 Samsung HZ35W
Alternate name EVOLT E-300 WB650
Type Advanced DSLR Small Sensor Superzoom
Launched 2005-01-10 2010-06-16
Body design Mid-size SLR Compact
Sensor Information
Sensor type CCD CCD
Sensor size Four Thirds 1/2.3"
Sensor dimensions 17.3 x 13mm 6.17 x 4.55mm
Sensor surface area 224.9mm² 28.1mm²
Sensor resolution 8 megapixels 12 megapixels
Anti aliasing filter
Aspect ratio 4:3 4:3 and 16:9
Full resolution 3264 x 2448 4000 x 3000
Max native ISO 400 3200
Max boosted ISO 1600 -
Lowest native ISO 100 80
RAW pictures
Autofocusing
Focus manually
AF touch
Continuous AF
Single AF
AF tracking
AF selectice
AF center weighted
AF multi area
Live view AF
Face detection AF
Contract detection AF
Phase detection AF
Number of focus points 3 -
Lens
Lens mounting type Micro Four Thirds fixed lens
Lens focal range - 24-360mm (15.0x)
Max aperture - f/3.2-5.8
Macro focus distance - 3cm
Available lenses 45 -
Focal length multiplier 2.1 5.8
Screen
Screen type Fixed Type Fixed Type
Screen sizing 1.8 inches 3 inches
Resolution of screen 134 thousand dot 614 thousand dot
Selfie friendly
Liveview
Touch functionality
Viewfinder Information
Viewfinder type Optical (pentamirror) None
Features
Lowest shutter speed 60s 16s
Highest shutter speed 1/4000s 1/2000s
Continuous shooting speed 3.0 frames/s -
Shutter priority
Aperture priority
Manually set exposure
Exposure compensation Yes Yes
Change WB
Image stabilization
Built-in flash
Flash range - 5.00 m
Flash options Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync
Hot shoe
AEB
White balance bracketing
Highest flash sync 1/180s -
Exposure
Multisegment metering
Average metering
Spot metering
Partial metering
AF area metering
Center weighted metering
Video features
Video resolutions - 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps)
Max video resolution None 1280x720
Video data format - Motion JPEG
Mic input
Headphone input
Connectivity
Wireless None None
Bluetooth
NFC
HDMI
USB USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec)
GPS None BuiltIn
Physical
Environmental seal
Water proof
Dust proof
Shock proof
Crush proof
Freeze proof
Weight 624 gr (1.38 pounds) 245 gr (0.54 pounds)
Dimensions 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1")
DXO scores
DXO All around score not tested not tested
DXO Color Depth score not tested not tested
DXO Dynamic range score not tested not tested
DXO Low light score not tested not tested
Other
Battery model - SLB-11A
Self timer Yes (2 or 12 sec) Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion)
Time lapse recording
Type of storage Compact Flash (Type I or II) SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal
Storage slots 1 1
Cost at launch $800 $300