Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W
67 Imaging
41 Features
31 Overall
37
91 Imaging
35 Features
42 Overall
37
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Key Specs
(Full Review)
- 8MP - Four Thirds Sensor
- 1.8" Fixed Screen
- ISO 100 - 400 (Bump to 1600)
- No Video
- Micro Four Thirds Mount
- 624g - 147 x 85 x 64mm
- Launched January 2005
- Other Name is EVOLT E-300
- Newer Model is Olympus E-330
(Full Review)
- 12MP - 1/2.3" Sensor
- 3" Fixed Display
- ISO 80 - 3200
- Optical Image Stabilization
- 1280 x 720 video
- 24-360mm (F3.2-5.8) lens
- 245g - 107 x 61 x 28mm
- Revealed June 2010
- Alternate Name is WB650
Meta to Introduce 'AI-Generated' Labels for Media starting next month Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Overview
Let's look much closer at the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W, former being a Advanced DSLR while the other is a Small Sensor Superzoom by manufacturers Olympus and Samsung. There is a substantial difference among the resolutions of the E-300 (8MP) and HZ35W (12MP) and the E-300 (Four Thirds) and HZ35W (1/2.3") enjoy totally different sensor size.
Pentax 17 Pre-Orders Outperform Expectations by a LandslideThe E-300 was manufactured 6 years earlier than the HZ35W and that is a fairly big difference as far as camera tech is concerned. Both the cameras come with different body type with the Olympus E-300 being a Mid-size SLR camera and the Samsung HZ35W being a Compact camera.
Before delving in to a step-by-step comparison, below is a simple view of how the E-300 matches up versus the HZ35W with regards to portability, imaging, features and an overall rating.
Sora from OpenAI releases its first ever music video Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Gallery
Following is a sample of the gallery pics for Olympus E-300 & Samsung HZ35W. The entire galleries are provided at Olympus E-300 Gallery & Samsung HZ35W Gallery.
Reasons to pick Olympus E-300 over the Samsung HZ35W
| E-300 | HZ35W |
|---|
Reasons to pick Samsung HZ35W over the Olympus E-300
| HZ35W | E-300 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Revealed | June 2010 | January 2005 | Fresher by 66 months | |
| Display dimension | 3" | 1.8" | Larger display (+1.2") | |
| Display resolution | 614k | 134k | Crisper display (+480k dot) |
Common features in the Olympus E-300 and Samsung HZ35W
| E-300 | HZ35W | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Manually focus | Dial precise focusing | |||
| Display type | Fixed | Fixed | Fixed display | |
| Selfie screen | Absent selfie screen | |||
| Touch display | Absent Touch display |
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Physical Comparison
If you're intending to carry your camera regularly, you will want to consider its weight and dimensions. The Olympus E-300 features external measurements of 147mm x 85mm x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") along with a weight of 624 grams (1.38 lbs) and the Samsung HZ35W has dimensions of 107mm x 61mm x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") having a weight of 245 grams (0.54 lbs).
Compare the Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W in our completely new Camera plus Lens Size Comparison Tool.
Take into account, the weight of an ILC will differ based on the lens you have at that time. Underneath is the front view dimensions comparison of the E-300 and the HZ35W.

Using size and weight, the portability rating of the E-300 and HZ35W is 67 and 91 respectively.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Sensor Comparison
Often, it can be difficult to see the difference in sensor sizing purely by going through technical specs. The visual below should provide you a better sense of the sensor sizing in the E-300 and HZ35W.
As you can tell, the 2 cameras posses different megapixel count and different sensor sizing. The E-300 due to its larger sensor will make achieving bokeh less difficult and the Samsung HZ35W will produce greater detail due to its extra 4 Megapixels. Greater resolution will help you crop pics somewhat more aggressively. The older E-300 will be disadvantaged in sensor tech.
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Screen and ViewFinder
Snapchat Adds Watermarks to AI-Created Images Photography Type Scores
Portrait Comparison
Photobucket discusses licensing 13 billion images with AI firmsStreet Comparison
Japan-exclusive Leica Leitz Phone 3 features big sensor and new modesSports Comparison
President Biden pushes bill mandating TikTok sale or banTravel Comparison
Samsung Releases Faster Versions of EVO MicroSD CardsLandscape Comparison
Apple Innovates by Creating Next-Level Optical Stabilization for iPhoneVlogging Comparison
Photography Glossary
Olympus E-300 vs Samsung HZ35W Specifications
| Olympus E-300 | Samsung HZ35W | |
|---|---|---|
| General Information | ||
| Make | Olympus | Samsung |
| Model | Olympus E-300 | Samsung HZ35W |
| Alternate name | EVOLT E-300 | WB650 |
| Type | Advanced DSLR | Small Sensor Superzoom |
| Launched | 2005-01-10 | 2010-06-16 |
| Body design | Mid-size SLR | Compact |
| Sensor Information | ||
| Sensor type | CCD | CCD |
| Sensor size | Four Thirds | 1/2.3" |
| Sensor dimensions | 17.3 x 13mm | 6.17 x 4.55mm |
| Sensor surface area | 224.9mm² | 28.1mm² |
| Sensor resolution | 8 megapixels | 12 megapixels |
| Anti aliasing filter | ||
| Aspect ratio | 4:3 | 4:3 and 16:9 |
| Full resolution | 3264 x 2448 | 4000 x 3000 |
| Max native ISO | 400 | 3200 |
| Max boosted ISO | 1600 | - |
| Lowest native ISO | 100 | 80 |
| RAW pictures | ||
| Autofocusing | ||
| Focus manually | ||
| AF touch | ||
| Continuous AF | ||
| Single AF | ||
| AF tracking | ||
| AF selectice | ||
| AF center weighted | ||
| AF multi area | ||
| Live view AF | ||
| Face detection AF | ||
| Contract detection AF | ||
| Phase detection AF | ||
| Number of focus points | 3 | - |
| Lens | ||
| Lens mounting type | Micro Four Thirds | fixed lens |
| Lens focal range | - | 24-360mm (15.0x) |
| Max aperture | - | f/3.2-5.8 |
| Macro focus distance | - | 3cm |
| Available lenses | 45 | - |
| Focal length multiplier | 2.1 | 5.8 |
| Screen | ||
| Screen type | Fixed Type | Fixed Type |
| Screen sizing | 1.8 inches | 3 inches |
| Resolution of screen | 134 thousand dot | 614 thousand dot |
| Selfie friendly | ||
| Liveview | ||
| Touch functionality | ||
| Viewfinder Information | ||
| Viewfinder type | Optical (pentamirror) | None |
| Features | ||
| Lowest shutter speed | 60s | 16s |
| Highest shutter speed | 1/4000s | 1/2000s |
| Continuous shooting speed | 3.0 frames/s | - |
| Shutter priority | ||
| Aperture priority | ||
| Manually set exposure | ||
| Exposure compensation | Yes | Yes |
| Change WB | ||
| Image stabilization | ||
| Built-in flash | ||
| Flash range | - | 5.00 m |
| Flash options | Auto, Auto FP, Manual, Red-Eye | Auto, On, Off, Red-Eye, Fill-in, Slow Sync |
| Hot shoe | ||
| AEB | ||
| White balance bracketing | ||
| Highest flash sync | 1/180s | - |
| Exposure | ||
| Multisegment metering | ||
| Average metering | ||
| Spot metering | ||
| Partial metering | ||
| AF area metering | ||
| Center weighted metering | ||
| Video features | ||
| Video resolutions | - | 1280 x 720 (30, 15 fps), 640 x 480 (30, 15 fps), 320 x 240 (60, 30 fps) |
| Max video resolution | None | 1280x720 |
| Video data format | - | Motion JPEG |
| Mic input | ||
| Headphone input | ||
| Connectivity | ||
| Wireless | None | None |
| Bluetooth | ||
| NFC | ||
| HDMI | ||
| USB | USB 1.0 (1.5 Mbit/sec) | USB 2.0 (480 Mbit/sec) |
| GPS | None | BuiltIn |
| Physical | ||
| Environmental seal | ||
| Water proof | ||
| Dust proof | ||
| Shock proof | ||
| Crush proof | ||
| Freeze proof | ||
| Weight | 624 gr (1.38 pounds) | 245 gr (0.54 pounds) |
| Dimensions | 147 x 85 x 64mm (5.8" x 3.3" x 2.5") | 107 x 61 x 28mm (4.2" x 2.4" x 1.1") |
| DXO scores | ||
| DXO All around score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Color Depth score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Dynamic range score | not tested | not tested |
| DXO Low light score | not tested | not tested |
| Other | ||
| Battery model | - | SLB-11A |
| Self timer | Yes (2 or 12 sec) | Yes (2 or 10 sec, Double, Motion) |
| Time lapse recording | ||
| Type of storage | Compact Flash (Type I or II) | SD/SDHC/SDXC, Internal |
| Storage slots | 1 | 1 |
| Cost at launch | $800 | $300 |